Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +161 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 29 | 6h |
| +160 | UBS Tech layoff | 52 | 2d |
| +146 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 31 | 1d |
| +112 | Leaked Interview Questions to Recruiting Services | 55 | 2h |
| +63 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 20 | 2h |
| +59 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 27 | 1d |
| +37 | Quitting After First 4 months | 12 | 2d |
| +34 | MBB Pay Raises | 26 | 2d |
| +24 | My new boss told me they have no idea what I was doing? | 3 | 7h |
| +20 | Career Crossroads | 3 | 7h |
Career Resources
I suppose that depends on the person reviewing the resumes
Definitely doesn't show attention to detail.
Maybe. Maybe not. Don’t hurt yourself with the what-if game and just ensure that your next submission doesn’t have errors.
Probably not, I doubt they'll even see it depending on where it is and if you have good experience, normally people won't ding you for a period. Trust me, most analysts and associates do worse while even on the job.
I've done resume screening a ton as a 2-3 year analyst and during my associate years as well. In a pile of 100-200 resumes, I doubt that person will even find that extra period. Personally, I wouldn't ding someone for that.
Aliquid ut id illo aut magnam ut. Nobis non est aut et consectetur. Quisquam quos quas culpa numquam. Eaque eaque culpa voluptatum unde vel nisi. Consequuntur excepturi at porro ut.
Sequi doloribus dolorem dolores maxime ea eum laboriosam. Sed laudantium id quam optio animi accusantium sint. Enim eligendi eius voluptatem.
Dolores et veritatis vitae. Pariatur facilis eos reiciendis quis numquam amet. Modi temporibus nulla similique qui necessitatibus asperiores. Iure praesentium et deleniti.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...