24 Comments
 
Best Response

Umm... you're not going to find an industry standard working model to value anything really.

Your best bet is to hit up the following resources for models:

http://www.macabacus.com/ http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/spreadsh.htm http://www.exinfm.com/free_spreadsheets.html Understand how they work

Next, understand how banks are valued: http://seekingalpha.com/article/53557-valuation-of-financial-institutio… http://www.bvappraisersconference.org/userfiles/files/Website_Conferenc…

Then use what you learned about valuing financial institutions and combine it with what you learned about general modeling and valuation and you've got your finished product.

 

Oh, even the bank that I'm valuing now has borrowed $ from a consortium to turnaround itself. I still don't need to do anything with debt if I were using equity multiples for valuation?

 

How would you value a private bank? I cam across this problem a few weeks ago... (I'm an intern so don't shit on me)

"Some things are believed because they are demonstrably true. But many other things are believed simply because they have been asserted repeatedly—and repetition has been accepted as a substitute for evidence." - Thomas Sowell
 

Multiples analysis is a form of relative valuation that can help you arrive at a rough estimate or range of EV based on industry average multiples. You'd want to compile a 'universe' of comparable companies CapIQ has a quick and easy function that can compile a quick list. The better matching in terms of business and financial profile the universe is, the more accurate/relevant the multiples analyis will be. From this you can apply a multiples to arrive at a valuation i.e. average industry multiple is 10x EV/EBITDA you apply this multiple to the EBITDA for your 'target' or the bank you're trying to value and you arrive at an average EV based on last reported EBITDA.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 

The difference between banks and non-financial services firms is that banks effectively buy/sell money. Given that context, interest income/expense is considered an operating expense (as compared to non-financial services firms where interest expense is a non-operating expense but rather, considered a financing cost).

As you already mentioned, using a DDM, you get your equity value and you stop there. (Equity value is post-interest). Also, for multiples, P/E and P/BV are commonly used multiples for banks. EV/EBITDA, or anything EBITDA wouldn't be very suitable because it doesn't account for interest income/expense.

 

you can use a DCF - just that it is much much harder given the difficulty to differentiate between assets/liabilities and interest income/expense, and how to classify it. For beginners, just use a DDM model projected based on ROE and Dividend payout ratio, and use the WACE rather than WACC. Back it up with a P/BV and P/E multiple.

 

Are you guys honestly recommending DDM? It has to be the most wacked out, retarded valuation method I have ever come across. Out of all the discounted valuation concepts this has to be the least rational.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
OreosAre you guys honestly recommending DDM? It has to be the most wacked out, retarded valuation method I have ever come across. Out of all the discounted valuation concepts this has to be the least rational.

Dude use P/B comps

I think conceptually, its a valid recommendation...

Given that the OP's assignment is probably for a 'basic' finance/valuation class, I'm sure that whoever is marking the assignment will be looking out for a DDM, as a form of valuation based on expected future cash flows (arguably one of the fundamental concepts in finance).

Would probably be a better approach to then criticise the weaknesses of the DDM model, some of which have been pointed out by West Coast Rainmaker, and supplement the valuation using more appropriate ratios, again explaining the 'pros' and 'cons' of each valuation methodology.

 

Ducimus veritatis reprehenderit illum sit quia ad. Modi eveniet quisquam ea sed corrupti ut. Et eaque tempora itaque laboriosam aut quo omnis. Consequatur et cumque temporibus aut. Eligendi quia est accusamus soluta modi est. Neque suscipit aut nihil numquam ipsam amet nihil. Voluptates recusandae quos corrupti nostrum est in.

Quibusdam nesciunt eaque in magnam. Adipisci consequatur aut quia magni. Aut rerum repellendus vitae eos. Modi harum sed molestiae accusantium nemo. In dolorem assumenda natus sapiente deleniti sint.

Ducimus sed rerum omnis quod non iste nemo optio. Praesentium odit excepturi consectetur ipsam eaque laudantium.

Ut est reprehenderit velit neque aliquid. Fugit voluptates enim est et ut pariatur. Et autem et possimus. Occaecati placeat dolorum odit numquam earum dolor.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”