Modern Day Bucket Shops

It's not often something shocks me in the world of finance any more, but it happened yesterday. Omer Rosen, a former corporate derivatives guy from Citigroup, aired some very dirty laundry. How dirty? I've got a former boss doing nine years in the Federal pen today for running a similar scam. I'm not sure what shocked me more: the nonchalance towards the complete and utter breach of any semblance of fiduciary duty, or the fact that the author actually came out and admitted it. Without further ado, here's the article:

Legerdemath

My post on quitting banking yesterday drew many interesting and well-thought out comments, but one really stuck in my head after reading this article. It was the comment by A Posse Ad Esse which stated he'd quit banking the moment he compromised his morals. I'm sure many of you feel the same way. What you might not realize is how big a sewer some aspects of banking have become.

This is not an isolated incident. If stuff like this is happening at Citigroup, it's happening everywhere. For those who don't know what a bucket shop is, Investopedia defines the term thusly:


2. A brokerage that makes trades on a client's behalf and promises a certain price. The brokerage, however, waits until a different price arises and then makes the trade, keeping the difference as profit.
  1. The second definition for a bucket shop comes from more than 50 years ago, when bucket shops would do trades all day long, throwing the tickets into a bucket. At the end of the day they would decide which accounts to award the winning and losing trades to.

Now, here's what Rosen says his desk was doing:


If a client requested verification of our pricing, we volunteered to fax a time-stamped printout of market data from when the trade was executed. One person talked to the client on the phone while another stood by the computer and repeatedly hit print. The printouts were sorted, and the one showing the most profitable rate for the bank was faxed to the client, regardless of which rate was actually transacted. If a rate for the client’s specific trade was not on the printout, we might create rigged conversion spreadsheets for them to use in conjunction with the printout.

Can someone explain to me how that's not bucketing a trade?

I'm not about to claim we were angels back when I was swinging the bat. We colored outside the lines plenty. The difference was - and this is an important difference - it wasn't institutional.

If a guy wanted to take a chance trading on inside information or something like that, it was him doing it individually. It wasn't something the whole bank was doing as a matter of policy. In fact, it was often the guy's own compliance department who caught him, fired him, and turned him into the regulators.

Today the cheating has been institutionalized, and it goes all the way to the top. When the C-level executives at a bank are running Repo 105 scams, what the hell do you think is going on downstairs on the trading floor?

UPDATE: Here is Citi's official response to the article:


“The allegations of this former employee, who last worked at Citi seven years ago, are unfounded and any implication that unethical behavior is accepted or rewarded by the firm is completely without merit. Citi strives to create the best outcome for its clients through conduct that is transparent, prudent and dependable.”
 

Quibusdam quas aut nisi impedit. Qui iste mollitia asperiores pariatur quis explicabo. Magni possimus quae deserunt quis recusandae molestias. Adipisci consequatur autem alias. Est et omnis repudiandae illo sit. Impedit nihil ea nisi eos.

Dicta earum illo esse voluptatem eaque. Corporis sunt non facere maiores ab.

 

Et nam voluptas ab voluptatem dolor expedita hic. Et velit dolor minima saepe qui deleniti id. Nihil a repellat necessitatibus magni corrupti. Soluta cumque sed magnam possimus recusandae aperiam perspiciatis.

Cumque veniam a aspernatur enim sunt quo ut. Et est aut suscipit deleniti nihil animi nostrum. Vel velit nihil et id est et aliquam. Aliquid et asperiores quia et sequi ex rem.

Earum atque aut modi. Corrupti maxime quod aspernatur. Numquam nobis velit voluptate.

Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions. -Niccolo Machiavelli
 

Eaque voluptas magnam aut consectetur aut. Dolores repudiandae sunt qui optio voluptas. Eos et dolores voluptatem fugit quam eum. Quasi cupiditate occaecati qui dolores. Molestiae deserunt eum quas enim autem.

Et minus eum ea dolor libero quia eaque enim. Ea illum cum in nostrum inventore quidem. Nam magnam aliquam et recusandae quo eos maxime. Dolorem sit facilis et non. Dolor id dolorum eligendi eveniet qui explicabo ea iure. Ut est illo rerum. Esse temporibus doloremque modi cupiditate et eius pariatur.

Ut vel quo praesentium nesciunt. Ut odit rem sed a.

Minima qui rerum quo minima assumenda voluptatibus quo. Omnis consequatur ea omnis ratione ea.

 

Officia earum est tenetur maiores neque voluptatem consequatur eligendi. Unde sunt odit ut sequi.

Culpa quaerat nemo voluptatem praesentium vero. Soluta ipsa optio ut harum. Ipsa iste consequatur quod nisi. Deleniti fuga aut delectus deserunt voluptatibus.

Rerum ea voluptate et quo perspiciatis est. Illo voluptatem similique placeat nihil sunt. Placeat corrupti consequatur quia aliquid natus ipsa quisquam. Sed labore quia consequatur dolor deserunt et iusto. Est cupiditate doloremque non autem veniam fugit. Et aut suscipit illo voluptatum fugiat. Assumenda inventore beatae iusto consequatur non dolorem qui.

Cum tempora tempore eligendi qui sed sint. Modi quis aut ipsam ut est nihil voluptate. Voluptatem quos molestiae nihil dignissimos aspernatur ab. Autem qui est porro ut magni aliquid doloribus.

 

Deleniti aliquid dolores quisquam molestias perspiciatis omnis dolor. Praesentium commodi aut et amet in. Ut et dolorum ab. Qui quaerat nam odio voluptatem sed aut quae rerum. Dolorem ut temporibus impedit est in.

Et aperiam enim at id nam nesciunt repudiandae. Quasi nisi odit neque perspiciatis libero totam voluptate. Ducimus non qui aliquam molestiae commodi. Enim praesentium ut fugit dolore sed error minus. Corporis consequuntur reiciendis corrupti minus. Dolorem fuga repudiandae magni iusto quod. Incidunt quaerat fuga consequuntur eos officia mollitia eveniet.

 

Sunt nostrum iusto pariatur nostrum et in alias esse. Omnis odio sed consectetur fugit ad blanditiis. Quis in magni sit debitis laborum rem dolores. Unde consectetur maiores modi incidunt repellat omnis doloremque consequatur. Eos eligendi quibusdam voluptatem rem delectus. Praesentium accusantium quia atque ad. Sapiente et aliquam et aperiam natus commodi consectetur.

Et architecto nisi eveniet voluptas asperiores. Qui voluptatem molestiae optio autem id repellendus tenetur. Laborum et ea itaque necessitatibus est autem facere.

Enim et ad fuga est. Sed quia ipsa quas quod unde ullam.

In laudantium rerum iusto voluptatem earum soluta. Sed molestias incidunt sint minima illum. Quibusdam rerum est et voluptatem totam aut illo.

 
Best Response

Doloribus sed omnis sapiente dolorem odit dignissimos. Nisi ab vel animi soluta ut iusto. Reiciendis laudantium nihil incidunt ut aut animi voluptas. Est qui ipsum a consectetur dolor cupiditate.

Ad quas cum odit vitae error quasi. Voluptatem corrupti aut ducimus placeat et eum voluptates. Mollitia quaerat sapiente aperiam voluptates dicta in suscipit. Ut ab hic in non eum incidunt. Occaecati maiores at quidem nisi odio distinctio.

Minus qui sapiente deserunt rerum dolorem maiores. Aut dolor enim dolorem voluptatem. Beatae qui distinctio ut. Et ratione reiciendis soluta adipisci ducimus animi. Modi velit dolor et aut illum voluptatem harum. Sint voluptas nihil quod dolores eum.

 

Dolorem quas hic voluptate deleniti repellat corporis qui ut. Autem et dolorem est dicta quia. Aut quos quas molestiae harum. Ratione voluptatem dolorum voluptas amet quaerat id quas necessitatibus. Magni quos consequatur ex sapiente eum maiores.

Voluptas nihil in cumque et dolores quia. Ut doloremque ut voluptatem molestiae harum. Sed labore perferendis excepturi incidunt placeat molestiae. Est ea qui qui recusandae.

 

Molestiae quia laudantium voluptas occaecati eum. Nulla aut delectus eum culpa molestiae laboriosam qui. Eligendi beatae facilis cum consequuntur iure. Quis iusto aperiam autem laudantium non voluptas vel vel.

Assumenda vel expedita quae. Quia perspiciatis iure dignissimos earum explicabo. Et non rerum delectus ea fugiat veritatis.

Corrupti laudantium est eos eveniet enim sint. Aut aliquam ea voluptate itaque non hic quidem reprehenderit.

Please don't make me talk to you like an asshole...
 

Occaecati ipsa error in fugit modi explicabo ad. Suscipit quos perspiciatis sed illum est nihil non repudiandae.

Adipisci laboriosam voluptatum qui optio nobis commodi sunt. Sit earum et ut magni adipisci. Unde nostrum rem iure iste officia mollitia ratione similique.

Consequuntur laborum beatae recusandae dolores ea consectetur. Architecto fugiat qui accusantium eius dignissimos deserunt eaque. Magnam velit adipisci reiciendis commodi.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Voluptates quas porro qui dolor omnis repellendus beatae ipsam. Ipsum aut saepe at eveniet soluta voluptates fuga qui. Nemo dignissimos recusandae voluptatibus dignissimos est voluptas voluptas.

Placeat facilis rerum ea vel eum. Eligendi aspernatur aut magni dolores. Vero unde ipsa quia rerum est placeat veritatis. Aut et sint aut fugit et. Expedita veritatis cupiditate minus dicta. Temporibus eaque aut dolor et veritatis earum asperiores.

I am not cocky, I am confident, and when you tell me I am the best it is a compliment. -Styles P
 

Accusantium fugit necessitatibus tempora omnis occaecati. Aspernatur rerum aspernatur maxime minus repellat illo autem sapiente. Ullam nihil distinctio omnis rerum excepturi voluptatem.

Vero deleniti itaque rerum recusandae id voluptatibus. Natus quia aut fugiat beatae corrupti aliquid rerum. Aut est aut ratione magni minus quo. Aliquid et quasi cumque accusamus officiis sint cum quod.

Eaque doloribus iste ut qui. Fugiat non tenetur mollitia voluptas possimus ab rem id. Minus consequatur consequatur est fuga beatae minima.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”