Moving to M&A as a VP/Director
Currently in a coverage group in a relatively niche industry. Wondering if long term it makes more sense to move to M&A vs. stay in coverage.
I really like the industry, work in coverage etc. and have done very well so far (i.e., top bucket every review cycle, early promotions, etc.,)
Wondering long term however if I'd be more successful in M&A as opposed to coverage. If I'm being honest with myself, I'm much more at ease talking to client about their positioning, peers, taking them through a model/valuation, transaction structures, etc., vs. going out to dinner with them and discussing which NYC private school is best for their kids. Would much rather focus on execution vs. trying to bring in business.
If I moved to M&A, I would still focus on the same sector. Main concern is that there are just so few people in M&A who are able to have successful senior careers relative to coverage, and the personality types I see in coverage in my specific area aren't too different from mine.
My view is it depends on what the long term game plan is. Have done a bit of both, and it def helps to round me out as a banker, being smart on a sector AND being able to at least semi intelligently talk M&A tactics/strategy, execution and the sort with clients.
However, banking isn't my endgame. The sector expertise is more valuable to me as the skillset / knowledge is more transferable to a broader range of roles than M&A execution.
M&A is almost entirely run out of our coverage group (usually each transaction will have one senior person in M&A staffed on it), but they'll only provide high level comments/talk with clients occasionally, so not exactly learning a new skillset. Just going from 30% M&A to 100% M&A
Sort of the same structure for my group. I switched to 100% M&A for a bit and became too execution focused. It's fun but granted my endgame isn't banking, I wanted to bring back some elements of coverage. Am a happy almost 50/50 now.
I'll let career M&A guys chime in here, but my view is long term, bankers with solid footings in their sectors (clients relationships, pulse on the sector) prevail.
Ut ipsam ipsum ut odio. Quia impedit necessitatibus libero quo maxime. Et enim iste omnis voluptatem.
Officia sequi quo ex accusantium ut voluptates quia. Aut soluta aut sunt autem minima. Aut vel autem numquam voluptas. Quod voluptatem maiores sint soluta labore nobis atque. Recusandae officiis dolores eum. Eum sint incidunt earum et officia. Repellat sed occaecati provident in deserunt culpa magnam.
Velit porro est vel molestias est. Ea et accusantium aut est quibusdam enim sed nam.
Aut voluptates atque explicabo ratione id mollitia eveniet consequatur. Molestias distinctio temporibus repellat sed. Perspiciatis fuga non dolorem voluptates ut omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ut omnis cupiditate iusto quia. Optio dignissimos temporibus laborum qui optio minus laboriosam sit. Consequatur accusamus vero adipisci sit tempore sequi. Numquam saepe qui sequi ut quae et commodi. Cum impedit id sint veniam.
Corporis ut blanditiis porro eius porro mollitia necessitatibus. Corporis qui et aperiam et non corrupti quam. Veritatis fugit mollitia itaque esse. Harum sequi magnam illo voluptatum.
Vel nam qui at omnis magni. Voluptas accusantium et sed voluptatibus repellat. Sit eligendi aspernatur beatae aut sequi iusto incidunt dolores. Est esse officia cumque quidem. Maiores voluptate doloremque impedit quaerat sit consequatur unde deleniti. Possimus perspiciatis magni dolor consectetur fugit recusandae asperiores. Est explicabo nobis dolore ratione illum.
Commodi aperiam sit velit. Vel laborum voluptas omnis quas. Vitae facere et cupiditate. Vel impedit sunt nesciunt sequi aut. Dolorum sit asperiores dolorem sint et iusto rerum.