28 Comments
 

Has just hit the FT


Perella Weinberg and Piper Sandler abandon merger talks 

A deal would have created an independent investment bank with market value of $6bn

Perella Weinberg and Piper Sandler had been discussing an all-stock merger but could not come to terms on final economic and personnel matters

9 MINUTES AGO

Perella Weinberg Partners and Piper Sandler have abandoned merger talks that would have combined two of Wall Street’s major independent investment banks.

The groups had been discussing an all-stock merger but could not come to terms on financial and personnel matters, according to multiple people familiar with the situation. The Wall Street Journal first reported on the possible combination last month. 

PWP, founded in 2006, has a market capitalisation of just over $1bn. Piper Sandler, a combination of the previous Piper Jaffray and Sandler O’Neill + Partners, has an equity value of about $5bn. 

Piper declined to comment. Perella did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

In recent weeks, the sides have been negotiating lock-up agreements with dozens of top PWP bankers to keep them aboard for several years. This had drawn concerns from some of those bankers. 

However, a sufficient number did not assent to the deal, the people added. PWP was formed by the Wall Street grandee Joseph Perella and Peter Weinberg, previously a longtime Goldman Sachs banker whose family had been involved in Goldman Sachs’ leadership since the 1930s.

Perella Weinberg, which has a large office in London, went public in 2021 via a merger with a blank-cheque company just after it separated its asset-management division. With annual advisory revenues of just under $1bn, it trails listed rivals Evercore, Lazard, Moelis and PJT Partners as well as the privately held Centerview Partners. 

Piper Sandler was formed in 2020 when the middle-market bank, Piper Jaffray, acquired Sandler O’Neill, a full-service investment bank dedicated to clients that were financial institutions. 

Piper shares are down a quarter this year while PWP’s stock price was down just about as much until rallying since last when The Wall Street Journal first reported merger discussions between the two. This is a developing story.

https://www.ft.com/content/dadac221-a4dd-4935-897e-7f7faebe8f17?syn-25a…

 

Anonymous Monkey:

Deal made no sense anyway


Actually made solid sense - PWP is pretty shit now relative to 2015 / partners likely want a payout - Piper’s punched above its weight class on the league tables for a while now

 

Well no shit that it makes sense for PWP stakeholders. But does it make sense for Piper? Because no banker at PWP (junior/mid-level/senior), who is worth their salt, would stick around to work at Piper. There goes your whole employment base / origination engine. Now what have you paid for? A logo? Some analysts / associates who couldn’t find an exit? These mergers rarely make sense for a reason

 

Partners put brand / prestige above rescuing a sinking share price

Former rental pig turned full time project monkey
 

What options are there really?

The partners didn’t want to be bought when it was probably in their best interest. They better continue to walk the walk and bootstrap, winning deals so the company can buy back shares and stabilize the price.

Big earnings call coming up on the 29th. Saw some big deals on their LinkedIn page over the past few weeks. Hopefully things can materialize.

 

Associate 2 in IB-M&A

BuT ThE LeAgUe TaBleS GuYs

I’ll take my $450K Associate 1 comp over your dogshit 20K Jefferies bonus because the league tables bro!!

Plenty of firms who pay at or better than PWP (or SocGen PWP given the direction of travel) that aren’t a bunch of clowns. I also doubt they have the money to pay bonuses for much longer.

 

Qui modi ex praesentium suscipit temporibus. Rerum voluptates rerum excepturi architecto neque quibusdam. Animi dolorem unde alias illum veritatis magni nam.

Sit quas non debitis incidunt aut qui officia. Iusto blanditiis quia eligendi quia id pariatur error. Qui nam nam ipsum totam reiciendis. Laboriosam quas ut est quo qui. Qui perferendis sed amet dignissimos vel. Et sequi accusamus dolores asperiores quaerat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”