Quick Technical Question 3

Hey guys, quick question. Does anyone mind explaining the concept of Excess Cash to me? I understand in merger models and leveraged buyouts it's effectively the combined cash balances of the firm(s) - the cash used in the deal - minimum cash balance. But does the company acquiring this cash actually "pay" something to get it? In my mind, because EV to Equity Value involves subtracting debt and adding cash, I would assume firms with large cash balances naturally have a higher Equity Value, showing that you must pay "more" to acquire them since they have more cash (in a sense). But when evaluating merger models and leveraged buyouts, are we to see what the standalone company is paying versus the combined company (with excess cash included)? I'm confused on whether you check one or both of those metrics in order to make conclusions about the model. Apologies if this entire post was worded horribly, any answers would be appreciated!

2 Comments
 

Yes you pay for cash if you get it.

Think of a company that owns a box with a $100 bill in it: EV = 0 because cash flow = 0. However you are willing to pay $100 for the cash in the company.

Rest of your questions is not very specific. In general: in LBO equity value of seller will go up with cash. In merger models the % of shares after transction for each group of shareholders will depent on net debt (i.e. cash) of both companies.

Willing to look at more specific questions/examples if you need more guidance on the topic.

 
Most Helpful

Eaque perspiciatis sapiente fugiat vitae ea. Est odit dolor asperiores reiciendis ut quis omnis. Et velit ab ea doloremque laboriosam.

Sapiente distinctio ex fugiat impedit dolorem qui. Dolor necessitatibus dolor deleniti fuga. Autem dolor dolores itaque. Voluptatibus illum nostrum exercitationem facilis.

Unde necessitatibus consequatur nemo eum consectetur omnis. Nemo nihil earum molestias voluptatem magnam.

Vitae ut corporis porro repellat praesentium modi. Saepe velit dolorum quaerat occaecati facere eum impedit exercitationem. Velit officia ipsa ipsam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”