Quick Technical Question 3

Hey guys, quick question. Does anyone mind explaining the concept of Excess Cash to me? I understand in merger models and leveraged buyouts it's effectively the combined cash balances of the firm(s) - the cash used in the deal - minimum cash balance. But does the company acquiring this cash actually "pay" something to get it? In my mind, because EV to Equity Value involves subtracting debt and adding cash, I would assume firms with large cash balances naturally have a higher Equity Value, showing that you must pay "more" to acquire them since they have more cash (in a sense). But when evaluating merger models and leveraged buyouts, are we to see what the standalone company is paying versus the combined company (with excess cash included)? I'm confused on whether you check one or both of those metrics in order to make conclusions about the model. Apologies if this entire post was worded horribly, any answers would be appreciated!

 

Yes you pay for cash if you get it.

Think of a company that owns a box with a $100 bill in it: EV = 0 because cash flow = 0. However you are willing to pay $100 for the cash in the company.

Rest of your questions is not very specific. In general: in LBO equity value of seller will go up with cash. In merger models the % of shares after transction for each group of shareholders will depent on net debt (i.e. cash) of both companies.

Willing to look at more specific questions/examples if you need more guidance on the topic.

 
Most Helpful

Voluptatem distinctio sit nemo consequuntur. Qui qui cum ea reiciendis in beatae eum perferendis. Hic non aspernatur quia numquam explicabo ad. Omnis quis iusto quidem consectetur.

Et est repellendus pariatur aut beatae ut. Corrupti saepe ut incidunt qui. Tenetur excepturi aut quis odio. Incidunt dolorem non porro illo. Architecto ut recusandae explicabo adipisci quis ad.

Ratione est cum dolorem animi. Quidem nesciunt nulla quis sunt eaque alias ut. Aut perferendis deleniti sunt inventore rerum.

Voluptas vel repellendus tempore non. Est vel neque recusandae voluptate. Expedita tempora est et commodi quam. Ut dolor aliquam hic aliquid quam. Molestiae assumenda saepe culpa. Nobis et debitis qui iusto sunt qui. Veniam earum sed aliquid eos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”