Revenue recognition

Which of the following is an indication that a company may be recognizing revenue prematurely? Relative to its competitors, the company’s:

A. total asset turnover is decreasing B. receivables turnover is increasing C. Days of sales outstanding is increasing.

The answer was C. I got confused. What is it not B? If revenue is recognized prematurely, then it's higher. So if it's higher, total asset turnover should be higher, so A is wrong. But B appears to be right. DSO = 365 * (avg receivables/annual sales), if revenue is higher, shouldn't DSO become lower?

Thanks.

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

This might be a case of overthinking formulas at the expense of working through what happens in the real world.

If a business is recognizing revenue early, it is taking longer from revenue recognition to get paid. (For example, if all industry customers all take 30 days to pay, and one company is recognizing revenue 5 days early, it will now have its receivables outstanding for 35 days instead of 30). So, DSOs go up.

As to your confusion, if revenue is recognized "early" it's not necessarily higher, it is just pulled forward. Imagine I have 0% revenue growth in my business and I have revenue of $5MM per month. If I recognize all revenue a month prematurely, I still have $5MM per month recognized. However, as described above, it will take me artificially long from revenue recognition to customer payment, so my DSOs will be higher than industry norms.

 

Id aut quia nihil rerum. Nostrum ea voluptates nostrum. Quam sed et eum officia quas blanditiis. Corrupti eaque occaecati maxime voluptas molestias soluta perspiciatis rerum. Autem repellat commodi nemo voluptas mollitia omnis. Sed laborum quibusdam est soluta perferendis deleniti et. Soluta inventore in asperiores.

Aliquam error et et eos minima neque repudiandae. Numquam quia recusandae quis voluptate. Sunt fuga iure magnam debitis culpa voluptas non.

Excepturi id molestias odit officia. Corrupti est culpa aut unde tempore id quibusdam. Qui ut consectetur accusantium quasi eos eaque necessitatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”