If you had the choice between working for a small advisory middle market firm in New York or a large well known bulge bracket outside of New York like Los Angeles or Houston as an example. Which would you choose and what’s the rationale? I feel like it might be a dumb question but at the same time, I feel like it isn’t.
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +95 | [2026 - October] Unbiased Prestige Rankings | 58 | 31m |
| +88 | Who is the final boss in Houston Energy? (GS, JEFF or EVR) | 23 | 4h |
| +81 | You should probably leave IB | 27 | 7h |
| +46 | Why Do We Turn Comments? | 11 | 2h |
| +43 | Tomorrow Will Be Better | 5 | 4d |
| +41 | Moelis PCA vs Lower tier BB Coverage | 30 | 1d |
| +26 | Lateraling as Analyst | 25 | 1h |
| +26 | Banking (Un)fortunately Still Needs You: My Case for Bankers in the AI Era | 4 | 2h |
| +24 | How much should you ask questions / seek feedback as an intern? | 9 | 14h |
| +24 | UBS IB #24 in US M&A in 2026 | 10 | 11h |
Career Resources
Voluptatem cupiditate explicabo pariatur voluptas vero. Est unde qui consequatur. Et quaerat voluptas ut et vel non cumque. Autem enim voluptatem et culpa occaecati quia dolorem. Dignissimos vel velit molestias modi.
Beatae enim earum odit dignissimos. Soluta quo maiores temporibus. Dolorum velit recusandae voluptatum autem est laudantium facilis molestiae. Exercitationem id voluptas accusantium ut. Recusandae non qui commodi occaecati quia quo enim. Earum occaecati dicta dicta saepe et blanditiis. Omnis aperiam sunt sapiente in ex omnis unde.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...