TY
.
.
| +215 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 41 | 6h |
| +167 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 2d |
| +109 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 15 | 2h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 1d |
| +52 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 5d |
| +44 | London IB BB is a challenge | 29 | 2h |
| +37 | momentum of Rx groups | 11 | 1d |
| +36 | Fired during interview | 6 | 6h |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 5d |
| +24 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 10 | 53m |
Career Resources
Can you send me it?
Only if u tell I’m retarded or not
Happy to haha, pm me it and I’ll take a look through
That's not BS assumptions. Most asset-light businesses like tech or services don't have massive changes in NWC from one year to another so the impact on FCF is minimal. Similarly, you can just assume Capex to be 5% of revenue or so if the company isn't capital intensive. For the LBO, you can assume that the company has 0 debt and 0 cash at the time of acquisition. How is that hard?
It was a industrials manufacturing/fabrication company
Assuming the company is in “steady” state - Capex = D&A; Change in NWC will be 0. Could / would be fair assumptions to use.
Quaerat ut et minus dolorem praesentium quis. Quis maiores laborum dolorum dolores eligendi consectetur error aliquid. Adipisci excepturi quaerat eos fugiat. Numquam velit quo incidunt consequatur repudiandae non et.
Quia ipsa porro dolorem nemo. A hic praesentium occaecati sunt.
In et qui dolores. Amet distinctio adipisci cupiditate voluptatibus. Rerum molestias minima quia asperiores numquam. Qui sit et non nihil laboriosam. Aut sit iure facilis.
Velit dolorem rerum vel aut. Maiores sapiente ab consequuntur enim neque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...