4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

ROIC ratio uses net debt + equity on the denominator and usually EBIT on the numerator. You could use NOPAT if you want though. The key is that you need to use an unlevered earnings metric with ROIC because invested capital includes net debt. Therefore, net income could never be used with ROIC. Always pair unlevered earnings metrics with EV or anything that includes debt and pair levered earnings(like net income) with EqV. Total capital is usually debt+equity instead of the net debt+equity in ROIC.

 

Ok I was confused because investopedia says to use NOPAT but in the video where it actually calculates ROIC they use Net Income - Dividends. Also, FactSet also uses Net Income in their ROIC calc.

So if I'm calculating ROIC for Microsoft I have (2019): EBIT: $42,959 Eff. Tax Rate: 10.2% NOPAT: $38,585 Book Value Debt (ST + LT Debt): $72,178 BV Cash (Cash + ST Investments): $133,819 BV Equity: $102,330 Total Invested Capital: $40,689 ROIC: 95%

Is this correct? On FactSet it says its ROIC is 22.7% and I'm worried I'm overstating it. However, FactSet uses Net Income and doesn't subtract cash and also adds in Operating Lease Liabilities with the biggest driver here coming from cash (op lease liabilities are rather small)

 

Unless I'm mistaken, you definitely don't use net income in the ROIC ratio. That wouldn't make sense because if you're looking at the return for all investors(debt and equity), how can you use an earnings metric that's only available to common stockholders? Rosenbaum and Pearl calculates ROIC as EBIT/average net debt+equity. I think NOPAT still works. In this case, net debt would be negative I believe because cash is outweighing the debt. I calculated it with the formula I outlined and got 106%, so you should be right if you're using NOPAT. Hope this helps

 

Omnis temporibus corrupti consectetur consequatur quia laudantium. Aut veritatis ut laboriosam enim illo. Quia omnis id nisi sed minima.

Voluptatibus voluptate quod accusantium nam molestiae. Est sed at veniam quidem est soluta. Asperiores sit porro velit sequi fuga. Ducimus ut molestiae iste ex facere aut sint. Sed soluta ipsam est explicabo nulla est fugiat. Nesciunt itaque sit provident voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.6%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”