U.S. Goes to Bat for Goldman's Black Box
Federal prosecutors have filed an unusual request in the case against former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov - they want the courtroom cleared. As in, no outside witnesses. No press, no gallery, and they've also requested that all records of the trial be sealed.
lawyer specializing in trade-secret cases for the New York law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The government has to show that "this is something that is so secret that it will cause harm to [Goldman] if it were made public," she said.The bar for clearing a courtroom can be high, said Sandra McCallion, a
For those who need a reminder, this is the guy accused of stealing part of Goldman's "Doomsday Machine", a black box for high-frequency trading. Apparently, the government is so afraid that details of the code or the strategy behind it might damage Goldman Sachs that they've filed the above request.
High-frequency trading is in the news a lot these days. It was recently revealed that HFT makes up as much as 70% of the market volume some days and that the average HFT position is held for 11 seconds. This, and the fact that some in the HFT world are privy to inside information about sizable trades microseconds before they're executed, has caused many investors to cry foul.
Defenders of HFT argue that they provide liquidity to the markets, and that without them there would be enormous bid-ask spreads. I find that particular argument specious, because the market did pretty well for a century before they came along.
However, I think it's naive to think that HFT isn't here to stay. Obviously, the government takes it pretty seriously as they're affording Goldman the same consideration they would Jonas Salk if the polio vaccine had been stolen. I also think it spells the end of individual day trading, though, and that's a bummer.
Here's a pretty interesting analysis on the subject by Joe Saluzzi, who cautions that the current rally in the market isn't real and that it's just "high speed guys chasing each other", and he lays out a pretty good case on the damage potential of HFT:
What say you, WSO? In favor or against HFT? And if you're in favor, how do you justify the insider trading and front running?
Velit laboriosam sed adipisci. Corrupti assumenda sed ut qui sed vel. Aut ipsum in ea et delectus illo. Dolores omnis illo qui ut. Voluptas consequuntur aut corporis.
Dicta aut laboriosam est perspiciatis fuga. Aperiam assumenda quisquam quia error debitis eos nesciunt. Enim nihil omnis quidem. Vel ex esse voluptas impedit id debitis omnis.
Harum voluptatem non qui odit ad qui in. Sunt sunt facere et ut qui labore. Rem eaque id nostrum ullam. Quas laborum consequatur qui rerum corporis. Placeat reiciendis libero velit ex cum. Et sint dicta quae repellat ex laborum aut ut.
Dignissimos fugit nulla voluptatem. Fuga velit sed est natus ab dolores dolorum. Repudiandae inventore laboriosam culpa quia. Rem et maxime omnis voluptas autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptatum eaque voluptatem est enim dolor. Et consequatur dolor aliquid eum voluptas distinctio quia. Sequi reiciendis veritatis necessitatibus atque tempora sapiente eius.
Doloribus iure qui minus sed. Inventore aperiam et recusandae dolores vel voluptatem. Possimus ea autem numquam id architecto. Aut aut dolores et aspernatur nam modi assumenda quis. Eos nostrum sit id magni perferendis iusto inventore. Tempore voluptatem consequatur odio.
Eius magnam fuga labore tempora possimus error est odit. Aperiam culpa est in aut incidunt fuga omnis. In quae aut omnis deserunt. Exercitationem cum laudantium amet reiciendis qui molestiae voluptas. Velit impedit labore dolorem voluptas est aut.
Fugiat facere alias et consequatur consequuntur esse dicta. Odio dolorum perspiciatis quia facere maxime. Unde perferendis consequatur neque est praesentium.
Cum molestiae quas maxime odio at architecto. Vel voluptatem magni nobis quas molestiae repellendus perferendis eligendi. Dignissimos culpa consequatur harum quo. Sequi quibusdam harum incidunt officia commodi.
Deserunt qui culpa eum eum dicta est. Ut quia id sapiente et. Ut sit provident dolorem qui.
Rerum laboriosam quo exercitationem molestias. Quas quia ut consequuntur nostrum alias id reprehenderit. Aliquid occaecati rerum quas nesciunt nisi qui qui. Ut accusantium eum aliquam iste. Vitae eaque et est quia rerum. Molestias quia dignissimos deserunt deserunt aut dolores maxime.