What causes WACC to invert?

Hi together, I'm currently working on a valuation and cannot figure out my mistake (if it is one). I calculate WACC by using the basic formula:

WACC = (E/V) * Cost of Equity + (1-(E/V)) * (1-t) * Cost of Debt

Since the company is private I calculate the Cost of Equity using the CAPM and a relevered beta. The formula therefore becomes:

WACC = (E/V) * (rf + BETAu * (1 + (1-(E/V))/(E/V)) * (1-t)) * MRP) + (1-(E/V)) * (1-t) * Cost of Debt

I noticed with my specific inputs (infrastructure company = very low unlevered beta, low risk free rate, low cost of debt) WACC declines when I increase (E/V) which seemed counterintuitive. I just differentiated the above formula (by hand so there might be a mistake) with respect to (E/V) and got the following result:

dWACC/d(E/V) = rf + t * BETAu * MRP - (1-t) * Cost of Debt

Looking solely on the deviated formula I can see that if the last part of the equation (= (1-t) * Cost of Debt) becomes greater than the first part (= rf + t * BETAu * MRP) WACC should decrease for an increase in (E/V). Mathematically understood (correct me if my maths has errors) but how can expain the result economically?

I most likely expect that indeed the math is wrong. The effect can happen when the asset yields an (unlevered) return that is lower than the cost of debt (which also seems counterintuitive in this case)

I would be grateful for any help!

 

Unless I missed it, you've provided no context for your cost of debt. You say it is "low" but it seems that it isn't actually that low relative to the cost of equity. Since your company appears to have a cost of debt, we can assume it actually has borrowings. Are the interest rates in your CAPM actually what the company pays in interest? Other potential culprit is your "very low" beta. Where did you get that? Can you defend it?

 

Aut est voluptatibus dolores aut et. Ut autem itaque excepturi nemo.

Adipisci doloribus rerum ea doloribus commodi. Accusantium accusamus quam et earum et alias pariatur. Dolore expedita aliquam officia reiciendis.

Qui laudantium laudantium est quia totam quis. Ut eos sit voluptatem rem maiores et. Quis vitae odio sit placeat inventore saepe corporis. Et at quos animi harum recusandae et ipsa. Velit sint at modi et nobis molestias.

Veniam quia dolorem impedit est molestiae recusandae. Unde dolorem sed reprehenderit non alias. Maiores non qui culpa dicta consequatur nesciunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”