What causes WACC to invert?

Hi together, I'm currently working on a valuation and cannot figure out my mistake (if it is one). I calculate WACC by using the basic formula:

WACC = (E/V) * Cost of Equity + (1-(E/V)) * (1-t) * Cost of Debt

Since the company is private I calculate the Cost of Equity using the CAPM and a relevered beta. The formula therefore becomes:

WACC = (E/V) * (rf + BETAu * (1 + (1-(E/V))/(E/V)) * (1-t)) * MRP) + (1-(E/V)) * (1-t) * Cost of Debt

I noticed with my specific inputs (infrastructure company = very low unlevered beta, low risk free rate, low cost of debt) WACC declines when I increase (E/V) which seemed counterintuitive. I just differentiated the above formula (by hand so there might be a mistake) with respect to (E/V) and got the following result:

dWACC/d(E/V) = rf + t * BETAu * MRP - (1-t) * Cost of Debt

Looking solely on the deviated formula I can see that if the last part of the equation (= (1-t) * Cost of Debt) becomes greater than the first part (= rf + t * BETAu * MRP) WACC should decrease for an increase in (E/V). Mathematically understood (correct me if my maths has errors) but how can expain the result economically?

I most likely expect that indeed the math is wrong. The effect can happen when the asset yields an (unlevered) return that is lower than the cost of debt (which also seems counterintuitive in this case)

I would be grateful for any help!

2 Comments
 

Unless I missed it, you've provided no context for your cost of debt. You say it is "low" but it seems that it isn't actually that low relative to the cost of equity. Since your company appears to have a cost of debt, we can assume it actually has borrowings. Are the interest rates in your CAPM actually what the company pays in interest? Other potential culprit is your "very low" beta. Where did you get that? Can you defend it?

 

Molestiae adipisci accusamus tempora aliquam ipsa sequi ut. Culpa voluptates sunt autem voluptatem et in dolore. Explicabo sit doloribus repellat sed itaque rerum.

Similique enim excepturi in sint sed magni atque. Dignissimos praesentium qui mollitia doloremque non et. Et consequatur quia et.

Et omnis culpa ea tempore reprehenderit sunt. Quam aliquid eligendi ad. Doloremque fuga eius odio ipsam et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Guggenheim Partners No 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (23) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (81) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”