Hi everyone,
A couple of people on WSO posted these two league tables for M&A advisory a few days back, and the bank's rankings vary significant between the two. I was wondering why would that be the case, and which one of them is more credible? It would be great to get people's views on this.
| +134 | Do people still want to go PE? | 39 | 5h |
| +108 | UBS Tech layoff | 48 | 8h |
| +96 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 22 | 8h |
| +44 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 9 | 10h |
| +37 | Lazard hirevue | 11 | 2d |
| +37 | What Differentiates the Best Analysts as AI Improves? | 9 | 2d |
| +33 | MBB Pay Raises | 22 | 3h |
| +32 | Cornell Club T10 Rankings (UPDATED 10/2026) | 19 | 10h |
| +31 | Quitting After First 4 months | 11 | 4h |
| +30 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 12 | 8h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
one is 2010 one is 2011
the Dealogic one is ANNOUNCED M&A TTM (March 10 - March 11)
The Reuters table only covers Q1 2011
so does the Reuters one take into account the deals mentioned in the Dealogic one?
Seems as if the Reuters is the more comprehensive.
Recusandae dolor eveniet in excepturi et. Consequatur itaque qui saepe quibusdam qui nulla qui eius. Tempore cum dolorem ipsam qui veritatis nobis. Sequi aspernatur aspernatur beatae delectus sunt illo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...