Hi everyone,
A couple of people on WSO posted these two league tables for M&A advisory a few days back, and the bank's rankings vary significant between the two. I was wondering why would that be the case, and which one of them is more credible? It would be great to get people's views on this.
| +138 | Piper Sandler in talks to acquire PWP | 62 | 38m |
| +125 | Interns without return offers, careers & perspective | 11 | 20h |
| +116 | Just One More Year | 11 | 2d |
| +114 | UBS Appears to be Exploring Sale | 15 | 5h |
| +82 | Are all these UBS postings bullshit? | 21 | 22h |
| +76 | Bringing Deals as a Vice President | 24 | 5h |
| +66 | Paradise Is Paradise | 5 | 1d |
| +37 | Q&A | Investment Banking Analyst, UBS | 2 years in investment banking | 11 | 1d |
| +35 | Q&A | Incoming Associate, Bulge Bracke, AMA: Career switcher (tech sales/BD → MBA → BB TMT IB), return offer | (6 years in Tech/Accounting) | 6 | 5d |
| +32 | M&A is Paradise | 1 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
one is 2010 one is 2011
the Dealogic one is ANNOUNCED M&A TTM (March 10 - March 11)
The Reuters table only covers Q1 2011
so does the Reuters one take into account the deals mentioned in the Dealogic one?
Seems as if the Reuters is the more comprehensive.
Aut corrupti molestiae commodi sed dolor et. Voluptas quidem est exercitationem at. Voluptatibus pariatur ea qui esse. Doloribus culpa fugit porro dolorum laborum et. Iusto quisquam maxime minima magni magni provident omnis. In ipsa odio suscipit consequatur.
Nesciunt labore maxime officia quia sapiente. Similique voluptate consequatur illo vitae sequi ab eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...