Why is interest expense ignored when computing FCF?
Can't understand the logic behind this one. Can anyone weigh in? ..........................................
Can't understand the logic behind this one. Can anyone weigh in? ..........................................
| +441 | Is UBS really that bad? | 81 | 6d |
| +318 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 37 | 19h |
| +226 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 53 | 29m |
| +164 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 25 | 1d |
| +149 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 28 | 14h |
| +141 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 22 | 23h |
| +140 | GF is an IB Analyst at a top BB, hates it, what exit options does she have? | 24 | 18h |
| +136 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 19 | 2d |
| +129 | How do you manage nerves in IB technical interviews? | 12 | 16h |
| +116 | Useless associates | 27 | 1d |
Career Resources
When doing an unlevered DCF, you're calculating FCFF (free cash flow to the firm), or just UFCF (unlevered). This is cash to the entire firm; cash to both equity and debt holders. Essentially, once you take get the NPV of all FCFF, you get the implied Enterprise value. Again, think about the equation of EV. Now if you were to include interest, you would be doing a levered DCF, calculating LFCF or FCFE (free cash flow to equity), because taking into account interest expense means that your earnings after tax was is interest-affected, so the remaining amount is available to equity holders. From my understanding, an unlevered DCF is used more often because it's easier to compare the models of two companies when ignoring capital structure.
Thanks this makes sense. So does that mean dividends aren't included in FCF also? (Since dividends are basically an "expense" for financing with equity).
Dividends aren't included in FCF calculation. Only place I've seen dividends are under the CF from Financing activities on the CF statement. Also, dividends are discretionary, not compulsory, The way you phrase it makes dividends sound like they are guaranteed or required.
It's to factor out capital structure.
It's because Investment bankers, unlike accountants are stupid and are clueless about where cash goes and comes from for a firm.
Facere eum minima accusamus quaerat. Sed qui qui impedit et quia velit neque. Officiis non quae harum aliquam. Maiores tempora et repellendus.
Enim dolor dolorum molestiae distinctio. Repellendus quas voluptatum saepe aperiam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...