Citi Commercial Banking vs. JPM MMSI
Would love to hear views on JPM Commercial Bank - Middle Market Banking & Specialized Industries Analyst Program vs Citi Commercial Bank Associate Program.
I understand one is analyst vs. associate role but considering culture, long-term comp, exit ops, WLB, and clientele. Which do you think has more upside?
Offered: JPM- Analyst: $82k + $4-12k (bonus range) -SF Citi- Associate: $110k (bonus not specified) - DAL
Both are ok starting points in the industry but both aren’t serious players in middle market so long term you would want to go elsewhere most likely. The Citi role would have way better pay relative to cost of living. In the long term San Francisco is a better market for commercial banking but you can move there later.
Great points. Who would you consider serious players in the MM space?
Jpm would be fine in a market they’ve already been in for a long time like Chicago or New York. But for San Francisco and most of the country a top player is Wells and then BofA for upper middle market. Then comes regionals like comerica and union bank. Svb completely dominates tech.
MMBSI pays more in Dallas which is odd. But I would take the associate role for more pay. You could lateral somewhere else later.
Maybe I can use that to negotiate. Do you know the Dallas pay range for MMBSI?
Incidunt rerum neque ad id. Sequi voluptatibus dignissimos sunt animi possimus. Voluptates cupiditate quia sed vel aut aliquam voluptatibus.
Omnis animi sed quia. Adipisci dicta excepturi tempore. Ipsa dolor qui enim accusantium officia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...