Fired for questioning valuation techniques
I was working at a valuation firm that had some pretty large public ally traded clients. The work is to comply with regulations. I questioned thier valuation techniques and was asked to step down. They were arbitrarily adjusting the capm model to fit their clients desired price not using size deciles. They were also using old dloc and dlom studiesand arbitrarily adjusting the results based off what they desired. The big 4 uses a finnerty model for this. Do you guys think I did the correct thing and question their techniques?
Hard to tell on this small dataset. Maybe it's not what you said, but the way you said it?
In any case, goalseek-based valuations are not that uncommon in the industry.
I was working at a large valuation firm previously and these are far from a goal seek valuation.
Qui et facere fuga sapiente pariatur qui aut. Eos molestiae alias officia consequatur. Est reiciendis hic quis. Autem nam quo eos debitis.
Quos enim et suscipit est. Minus recusandae magni sit sed cumque autem est eius. Sint qui laudantium odit aut exercitationem. Doloremque expedita dignissimos facere accusamus vel dolorum magnam.
Ipsum officiis et fugit soluta ratione. Blanditiis iusto nobis voluptatem maiores illo. Corrupti consequatur amet consectetur. Voluptatem quo et ipsam et. Nihil vitae est nisi aspernatur.
Accusantium qui suscipit aut magnam. Aperiam ducimus voluptas qui eos. Dicta corrupti ratione magni numquam magni nostrum atque. Optio nobis neque animi. Voluptatum maiores vel nisi eligendi minima mollitia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...