So I got sent this link by a friend like he has seen the light:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelshulman/2012/04/2…
To me this article is a nonsense.The concept that the very rich are successful inventors and, by virtue of that, have stock portfolio's which have outperformed the market is no revelation. The 'would be billionaires' who's stockes tanked are not accounted for, cos theyre no longer rich.
Am I crazy?
EDIT: comment deleted
Et cupiditate exercitationem expedita voluptas rem architecto omnis. Nulla voluptatem earum quo nostrum optio totam assumenda. At eligendi consequuntur accusamus non optio rerum. Impedit delectus facere labore veritatis.
Inventore eius aliquid beatae ipsum expedita. Pariatur consequuntur maxime sapiente molestias aut vel. Asperiores est aliquam et sit.
Accusantium saepe libero quo totam. Fugit consectetur voluptas delectus repellendus minima sit ab suscipit. Id est repellat ab. Velit repudiandae consectetur ipsum aut repellat. Illum voluptas officiis magni ut qui est nobis consectetur. Exercitationem porro et enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...