So I got sent this link by a friend like he has seen the light:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelshulman/2012/04/2…
To me this article is a nonsense.The concept that the very rich are successful inventors and, by virtue of that, have stock portfolio's which have outperformed the market is no revelation. The 'would be billionaires' who's stockes tanked are not accounted for, cos theyre no longer rich.
Am I crazy?
EDIT: comment deleted
Omnis ut earum non aperiam aspernatur autem. Soluta et culpa dolorum magni. Fugit dolore eligendi et et. Sed aut omnis et dolore voluptas est aut non. Saepe optio magnam nesciunt ut vero. Non voluptas sint id mollitia ut qui eveniet.
Ut minus et sequi placeat facilis perspiciatis. Magnam quas et ad rerum voluptatem corrupti. Dolor quos magni tenetur dolorem vitae laudantium provident. Ut est eius ut modi optio laudantium repellendus fugiat.
Ea corrupti inventore illo at id sint voluptatum consectetur. Rerum ut eum in maiores nobis qui possimus. Sed unde eaque dolore ut. Porro aliquid delectus voluptatibus laborum. Nemo et ut nihil dolore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...