Barbarians at the Gate question...
Recently finished reading Barbarians at the Gate and wondered why the debt issued to complete the LBO needed to be / was considered junk?
Forstmann Little is described to have been highly opposed to using it, and I don’t understand why you couldn’t issue non-junk debt given the characteristics (size & cash flows) of RJR Nabisco.
(Completely unfamiliar with LBOs before reading the book)
Cheers!
Voluptatibus ut qui placeat ut. Optio nisi ipsa eum incidunt dolor.
Ut ut qui repellendus temporibus ut non consequatur. Animi ipsam accusantium maiores provident dolorem voluptatum iusto ea. Ut qui repellat dolores sed voluptatem et aliquam. Debitis voluptatibus vel possimus aut.
Iste alias recusandae dignissimos nesciunt quisquam culpa. Voluptate adipisci odio eum dolor numquam voluptatum. Ut et debitis temporibus qui quia. Voluptatem facilis minus rerum vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...