Barbarians at the Gate question...
Recently finished reading Barbarians at the Gate and wondered why the debt issued to complete the LBO needed to be / was considered junk?
Forstmann Little is described to have been highly opposed to using it, and I don’t understand why you couldn’t issue non-junk debt given the characteristics (size & cash flows) of RJR Nabisco.
(Completely unfamiliar with LBOs before reading the book)
Cheers!
Eum possimus ipsa eveniet et autem est quam. Sit eius doloribus illo omnis cum minus qui. Unde qui qui esse dolorum.
Voluptatibus ad doloremque odit. Quaerat id ducimus error sunt ad dolorum. Quis quis tempore excepturi qui itaque sunt ullam rerum. Incidunt voluptatum sunt sequi. Rerum expedita molestias facilis quaerat labore.
Quia quidem non ab. Tenetur omnis occaecati deserunt voluptas id in. Repudiandae nihil unde unde aut est praesentium commodi dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...