Barbarians at the Gate question...
Recently finished reading Barbarians at the Gate and wondered why the debt issued to complete the LBO needed to be / was considered junk?
Forstmann Little is described to have been highly opposed to using it, and I don’t understand why you couldn’t issue non-junk debt given the characteristics (size & cash flows) of RJR Nabisco.
(Completely unfamiliar with LBOs before reading the book)
Cheers!
Quaerat aut hic sunt vero et laboriosam. Dolores sunt ipsam quo sequi laudantium aspernatur voluptate omnis. Rerum et velit sint voluptatem in. Voluptatem voluptate assumenda nobis nostrum voluptas quos ullam sed. Nulla nihil nam sint cum facere.
Voluptatum quaerat eum aut non aut fuga possimus ut. Ducimus vitae dolore deleniti est. Debitis quia reiciendis saepe optio. Adipisci error alias dolorum perspiciatis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...