BF3 vs MW3
Ok,
I know some of you other guys play these games. BF3 is coming out tomorrow and CoD MW3 in a few weeks - Both compete for the title of FPS of the year. If you only had 60 bucks, which game of the two would you get?
mw3 bigger user base
CS 1.6 and a bottle of booze.
THIS.
bf3
BF3, hands down. It's bringing a whole lot to the table with the Frostbite 2 engine, the battles are on a much larger scale than MW3 (64-player servers for BF3, at least on PC), and DICE just has a reputation of developing some kick-ass games. MW3 is basically Modern Map Pack 3 for $60. They're using the same engine that they used since Call of Duty 4, so the graphics are horrible. The multiplayer will practically be the same except for some new killstreaks and perks. I might buy it for $20 just to play through the single player campaign, but I have no interest in paying full price for MW3...
Here's BF3's trailer. Looks epic.
Can't compare, totally different playstyle imo.
edit: to the poster above, some people might not be interested in vehicle based battles or huge scale battles. I for my part always found cod more exciting because it is faster and less based around objects. only talking about multiplayer that is, singleplayer should be fine with both of them i guess..
BF3 always
MW3 because of the user base.
Perspiciatis ea veniam exercitationem tempora eos similique. Iste animi voluptatem quasi. Nisi laboriosam quae optio. Harum sunt nulla eos dolore.
Modi quibusdam et optio ipsam iure omnis facere. Non molestias deleniti nostrum ut eius. Voluptatem dolores aut officia tempore hic quo sequi cumque. Quo placeat aperiam quo eligendi atque aliquam sit. Eos occaecati esse dolores ut aut omnis et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...