Decisions under Distress

Max Wünsche (left), a hard-nosed leader in his late twenties, with more combat experience than any Allied soldier in France on that day, and awarded every major decoration one would want, had taken charge of five thousand 14-16 year olds, and was now sitting down in a war conference with two others. He had faced off with an entire Anglo-Canadian advance by the 21st Army Group consisting of 250,000 men, 2500 tanks, 800 artillery guns earlier that morning. Colliding with one Canadian and two British armoured divisions, he held his ground until they were stalled in the Bocage countryside near Caen, in three roads trying to close in on their objective: the Caripet Airfield and the city of Caen itself.

Wünsche thought he had a greater grasp of the information required to make a quick decision. On the other side of war conference sat Kurt Meyer (right). Meyer, or Panzer Meyer, was an entirely different leader. Cautious, but aggressive, his orders were more realistic and took into consideration the overall battle plan for the entire German army, the Panzergruppe West, throughout the Normandy battlefield. He held a general bird’s eye view to any operation, from a squad-sized one of 12 to an entire divisional attack. No advance, no matter the ground gained, he argued, could ever be achieved over the long-term if it didn’t suit the positions of other units that were commanded by equally different men.

Additionally, he knew about what was happening while Wünsche was gone. Fritz Bayerlein, formerly Rommel’s head of Panzer Operations in North Africa was now in charge of the Regular Army’s most prized asset -- The Panzer Division Lehr – which had stood, in force, to the exact left of the 12th SS Panzer Divison.

Like a completely different corporate culture, it wanted to push the Allies back too – but it wasn’t fanatical like Wünsche‘s 14 and 15 year olds of the 12th Panzer Regiment. Its men averaged between 27-32 years old, were combat instructors before and during the war, were often not Nazi-Party members, had families, and were more importantly had been better equipped until that morning.

After an enormous bombing by an entire American Air Army on the morning of the day, and the British shelling by up to six-hundred guns until the late morning, it had missed the 12th SS when Witt (centre) ordered the division forward, but scattered Panzer Divison Lehr. Kurt Meyer would later overhear Field Marshal Erwin Rommel call to Bayerlein, furious at his old friend, asking ‘Why are your men not advancing! Why aren’t they pushing them back like Wünsche’s regiment to your right? Why are you not with your men Fritz?’ some crackling could be heard over the radio by Panzer Meyer, but he ascertained Bayerlein’s fateful answer, ‘they’re not advancing, Herr Field Marshal, because they’re in their fox-holes sleeping and cannot move… they’re all still… they’re lying dead where they stood’.

More static. Rommel finally understood Panzer Lehr was no more. He pulled it out, bringing back a few thousand of the original twenty-thousand to Hill 112 behind the far left of the city of Caen and Kurt Meyer’s regiment. He called Kurt Meyer knowing he was on the frequency, with a stern repose to ‘take up the entire slack from Hill 60 to the airport.’ Once again, Kurt Meyer fully evaluated the situation on his own and called up Witt and relayed what Rommel had told him with an independent conclusion: to hold to the last there was nothing left between them and Caen. It was do or die.’ Meyer also understood that between them and Caen was a three-day drive from Paris – taking Caen meant taking Paris and the entirety of North France with an option of flanking around the remaining German troops and trapping them far west of the capital city.

Kurt Meyer, to paraphrase former Baxter CEO Harry Kraemer in his book, From Values to Actions, from that point embedded in his plan a larger perspective consistently, and it above all things gives a great leaders the upper hand. He lacked any real information about what he faced – but he knew what his objectives were, and more importantly surmised the objectives of neighbouring commanders – he went on to formulate Plan A, B, C, and D for each eventuality from that angle.

His first objective was to persuade the divisional commander and Max Wünsche into a very risky manoeuvre. Split the entire division of 15,000 into two groups. One under Max and one under him – take the other under Wünsche and have it settle down between the airfield and Hill 60. Meyer’s mechanized infantrymen would move to the left and take up the gap between Tilly-sur-Seulles and the road leading to Villers-Bocage left by Panzer Lehr.

Back at the war conference Meyer conveyed his plan to Wünsche. Meyer was correct, according to Professor Deepak Malhotra, as he stayed at the table and asked Max to fully commit, to engage fully with his plan while considering its flexibility. Wünsche who was technically more senior and didn’t have to follow along –understood there was very little to pivot from. He agreed because Meyer did not convince him with the merits of his plan but rather had essentially given him his view which took into contention what was going on while he had been gone -- an analysis of his he left out. The divisional commander Witt, completely exasperated became apathetic agreed because he calculated in ten minutes approximately a thousand tanks would be colliding into their lines. But Operation Perch would stop there, the 14th of June 1944.

 

Minus id consequatur magni animi labore. Fugit et quia veniam in. Cupiditate quibusdam quod rem. Sed unde repellat qui dolore distinctio nesciunt ex.

Reiciendis non quia sed. Magnam natus nihil mollitia sit quis. Quis repellendus ipsam aut id. Natus voluptate laborum sapiente est sint asperiores rerum.

Ea nihil qui modi veniam earum sapiente. Hic delectus ipsam consectetur quidem facere. Saepe mollitia qui enim minima voluptatem perferendis dolorum. Sunt esse explicabo praesentium consequatur ipsam. Ratione et aut sit eveniet. Sed est sit temporibus quisquam. Est et numquam ipsam officiis libero. Ut dolor delectus nesciunt eius et.

Adipisci odit quo et error in quae est. Excepturi adipisci quibusdam voluptates dolores dignissimos quam. Sit dolorum porro ut molestiae quibusdam quasi. Aut consequatur odit velit voluptates dolorum nemo.

I hate victims who respect their executioners

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”