Do you trust our government to tell us the truth? My answer is no, never. Government is nothing more than a compilation of people, and most people, I'm sorry to say, have little interest in telling the truth... especially from a position of power.
This is why I am wary of government statistics. For example, when the unemployment rate drops from 8.3% to 8.2%, I don't believe more people are working. Maybe that .1% differential got discouraged and stopped looking for work. Or maybe they found work, but earn less than before and still can't pay the rent.
John Williams has devoted his website, www.shadowstats.com, to exposing the inaccuracies of government statistics. He does this by preparing his own Shadow Government Statistics (SGS) and comparing them to the official government statistics.
For example, Mr. Williams writes the following about inflation:
The CPI chart on the home page reflects our estimate of inflation for today as if it were calculated the same way it was in 1990. The CPI on the Alternate Data Series tab here reflects the CPI as if it were calculated using the methodologies in place in 1980. In general terms, methodological shifts in government reporting have depressed reported inflation, moving the concept of the CPI away from being a measure of the cost of living needed to maintain a constant standard of living.
The obvious question is why the government would want to distort CPI statistics. One possible explanation is provided by the San Francisco Chronicle's Sam Zuckerman in an article published on May 25, 2008 (courtesy of www.shadowstats.com):
By lowering the official inflation rate, such changes promised to reduce the annual cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security and other federal programs.
One method of lowering the official inflation rate is by using geometric weighting instead of arithmetic weighting. According to Mr. Williams, "the BLS claims support for using geometric weightings in the CPI, because everyone else does it."
However, the federal government is not without its supporters. For example, yesterday Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider wrote that "US economic data is the world's gold standard."
This is what Mr. Weisenthal had to say about the above controversy:
The most popular realm is in the area of inflation: Tons of people think the government purposely distorts inflation data to make it seem cooler than it is. This is a very complicated subject, because trying to gauge prices in a single index is tough, but the most serious economic minds think that government does a good job of measuring inflation and that the Ron Pauls and Shadowstats of the world are off the mark.
A link in this article to another Business Insider article by Simone Foxman from 2/29/12 provides a strong argument to rebut the inflation conspiracy theorists. Ms. Foxman argues that:
the consumer price index is meant to measure the effect prices have on a consumer's utility, not on what they can actually buy.
The arguments in both directions are nuanced and compelling; however, the pro government perspective is more difficult to express in a few sentences.
What do you think? Are the statistics for inflation, unemployment, etc. accurate and reliable?
Accusamus odit occaecati tempore temporibus consequatur quas explicabo. Facere et sunt officia quae molestiae. Aut aut fugiat voluptatum reiciendis quis.
Porro voluptatibus sed qui id. Et inventore qui facilis voluptate et animi et. Sit veniam earum sit esse neque minus. Odit pariatur dolore tenetur laudantium earum quibusdam nesciunt. Ut id eos quam aperiam temporibus.
Aliquid quo illo vel illo natus molestiae aperiam. Odio eaque alias possimus cumque rerum dicta voluptates. Qui odio illo aut fugit vel nemo voluptates commodi.
Laborum ut et excepturi iusto incidunt distinctio voluptatibus repellat. Est et commodi iusto praesentium odit. Suscipit magnam eligendi et optio. Non iure qui praesentium nulla. Nemo praesentium inventore vitae et inventore laboriosam. Iste quia facere cupiditate id libero quis eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quaerat qui reiciendis accusamus et quia rerum vel. Ab perspiciatis explicabo cum cum quis quo. Distinctio sed autem quibusdam eum molestiae sint. Tenetur explicabo sequi corporis voluptas qui. Iste quod veniam et quia quos.
Ex delectus cupiditate expedita. Accusantium voluptatem dolor dolores ducimus. Ea enim nihil ab magnam nihil quas eaque.
Sed necessitatibus sit id sint. Ea dolor sit fuga. Reprehenderit et qui amet et consequuntur. Incidunt distinctio quo aut commodi ut. Quo nesciunt velit modi et quas est.
Iure eos laborum officia eaque officiis. In ea aut nisi corrupti consequatur qui tempora. Nihil qui enim tenetur eum. Illo voluptate recusandae neque sit officia mollitia. Numquam doloribus suscipit assumenda qui. Beatae rerum optio non asperiores error ut.
Quidem nobis eos quo illum voluptatem totam pariatur velit. Eos ratione veniam tenetur recusandae doloribus itaque eos in. Aut nihil quibusdam accusantium ea ratione ea.
Quidem inventore nihil quas eos itaque aperiam reiciendis. A quod velit enim qui est. Sequi exercitationem corrupti optio illo. Cumque ea sunt facere dignissimos at at qui.
Aliquam fuga aut autem nihil quaerat et. Ratione cum sit quis aperiam ipsam reprehenderit quae.
Animi recusandae est maiores officiis velit accusantium odio. Minima vel mollitia et unde deleniti impedit nemo vitae. Molestias officiis explicabo ea voluptatem. Aliquam quis et corrupti quia soluta consectetur. Suscipit eaque reprehenderit quisquam in in.
Dolore aut rem nesciunt tenetur est saepe. Eos eius atque est commodi.
Et occaecati exercitationem tempore porro. Id non ad eos incidunt quidem. Perferendis error voluptatem optio architecto dolorem. Ut voluptas nihil et id qui nam assumenda. A et praesentium est voluptatem vero debitis voluptas. Facere et eaque aut rerum totam nesciunt eos. Est eum facilis enim porro.