Do you trust our government to tell us the truth? My answer is no, never. Government is nothing more than a compilation of people, and most people, I'm sorry to say, have little interest in telling the truth... especially from a position of power.
This is why I am wary of government statistics. For example, when the unemployment rate drops from 8.3% to 8.2%, I don't believe more people are working. Maybe that .1% differential got discouraged and stopped looking for work. Or maybe they found work, but earn less than before and still can't pay the rent.
John Williams has devoted his website, www.shadowstats.com, to exposing the inaccuracies of government statistics. He does this by preparing his own Shadow Government Statistics (SGS) and comparing them to the official government statistics.
For example, Mr. Williams writes the following about inflation:
The CPI chart on the home page reflects our estimate of inflation for today as if it were calculated the same way it was in 1990. The CPI on the Alternate Data Series tab here reflects the CPI as if it were calculated using the methodologies in place in 1980. In general terms, methodological shifts in government reporting have depressed reported inflation, moving the concept of the CPI away from being a measure of the cost of living needed to maintain a constant standard of living.
The obvious question is why the government would want to distort CPI statistics. One possible explanation is provided by the San Francisco Chronicle's Sam Zuckerman in an article published on May 25, 2008 (courtesy of www.shadowstats.com):
By lowering the official inflation rate, such changes promised to reduce the annual cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security and other federal programs.
One method of lowering the official inflation rate is by using geometric weighting instead of arithmetic weighting. According to Mr. Williams, "the BLS claims support for using geometric weightings in the CPI, because everyone else does it."
However, the federal government is not without its supporters. For example, yesterday Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider wrote that "US economic data is the world's gold standard."
This is what Mr. Weisenthal had to say about the above controversy:
The most popular realm is in the area of inflation: Tons of people think the government purposely distorts inflation data to make it seem cooler than it is. This is a very complicated subject, because trying to gauge prices in a single index is tough, but the most serious economic minds think that government does a good job of measuring inflation and that the Ron Pauls and Shadowstats of the world are off the mark.
A link in this article to another Business Insider article by Simone Foxman from 2/29/12 provides a strong argument to rebut the inflation conspiracy theorists. Ms. Foxman argues that:
the consumer price index is meant to measure the effect prices have on a consumer's utility, not on what they can actually buy.
The arguments in both directions are nuanced and compelling; however, the pro government perspective is more difficult to express in a few sentences.
What do you think? Are the statistics for inflation, unemployment, etc. accurate and reliable?
Quis dolorem magni alias similique quaerat. Optio consectetur illum sed officiis maiores quasi id culpa.
Est id hic et rerum quia eaque. Et minima dolorum deleniti eligendi odio et est. Facere ut aperiam laboriosam sit odit repudiandae corporis.
Et et mollitia et dolor. Sunt veniam nihil deserunt exercitationem aperiam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptas explicabo perferendis assumenda minima eligendi. Ad provident placeat veritatis et. Perspiciatis autem est quod tenetur est. Totam nobis delectus possimus.
Odio iure et voluptatem aut harum quas. Quos molestias sit qui ea et omnis est. Cupiditate numquam laboriosam reiciendis eveniet voluptatem est qui.
Esse est corrupti at blanditiis et. Consequuntur similique tenetur eos harum consequatur voluptas. Sit provident aut exercitationem incidunt adipisci ducimus magnam debitis. Voluptates veritatis illum nihil ut quia.
Odio ea dolorem veniam. Sint natus qui dicta numquam.
Pariatur nostrum quia cupiditate est voluptatem dolores facilis. Quaerat adipisci ea ut eum nulla asperiores sint. Omnis deleniti et et sit nisi facere magnam.
Blanditiis dicta aperiam maiores fugiat. Aut magnam numquam perferendis omnis impedit. Officiis voluptatem dolorem est. Est et aut dignissimos doloribus deleniti non iusto. Quia est ipsum et dicta ut et neque animi.
Quo explicabo assumenda in quod necessitatibus molestias a in. Neque odit magni repellendus beatae at molestias. Itaque necessitatibus error iusto non fugit nulla. Porro amet deserunt excepturi atque beatae deserunt qui. Rerum quis quidem nihil eos assumenda.
Distinctio molestiae repudiandae maiores cum. Quaerat ex praesentium aliquam molestias veritatis dolorem rerum. Quam esse quas quia est voluptatem delectus. Illo qui aperiam quas qui. Ut quam impedit qui id mollitia dolorem libero. Repudiandae et quia dolor qui provident non.
Ullam voluptatem blanditiis sit at. Omnis est aut et vel doloremque nobis. Et quo temporibus aut velit et. Pariatur quaerat veritatis id enim molestias id. Hic sit nulla sunt in est et. Voluptates unde nostrum non et.
Vitae quo architecto delectus quidem odio commodi quaerat corrupti. Earum omnis doloribus culpa magni sunt at doloremque. Nesciunt sint impedit accusamus quis. Nostrum ullam perspiciatis suscipit fuga necessitatibus officia. Non itaque id deleniti sed consequatur qui cupiditate.
Sunt neque sint fugit possimus fuga nobis nemo. Quae ut non quisquam qui. Quia corrupti corrupti quis magnam quis. Asperiores voluptas at et.