Major Private Equities Gets Sued for Collusion

In a piece from Dealbook written by Peter Lattman and Eric Lichtblau, the article writes about a lawsuit against PEs for colluding on some of the biggest deals in the past few years. The antitrust civil lawsuit was filed by former shareholders against 11 of the largest private equities (e.g. Blackstone, KKR, Bain) who claim that their “anti-competitive behaviors” had cost them higher bids. E-mail exchanges between executives were also used as evidence for cooperation between the funds. Does the lawsuit hold water or are the plaintiffs just a bunch of opportunistic butt-hurt shareholders looking to cash in on an inconclusive investigation by the Justice Department? You decide.

In September 2006, for instance, Blackstone and K.K.R. were both circling the technology giant Freescale Semiconductor. After a Blackstone group outbid a K.K.R. consortium to buy Freescale for nearly $18 billion, Hamilton E. James, the president of Blackstone, e-mailed his colleagues about Henry Kravis, the billionaire co-founder of Blackstone’s rival. “Henry Kravis just called to say congratulations and that they were standing down because he had told me before they would not jump a signed deal of ours,” Mr. James wrote.

PE’s working together isn’t anything new. It's not surprising that PE’s would collude since PEs regularly engages in consortium's to diversify risks in a deal. Depending on your vantage point, both sides have plausible arguments. If you’re a former shareholder who felt cheated from a significant return, it wouldn’t be difficult to imagine one’s resentment especially if the law is on your side. If you’re a financier, then you would know how expensive an acquisitions could be. In fact, cash has been building up lately as deals have been drying up. As a result, PEs have been paying higher multiples (10.6 from 10.3 price to EBITDA) for companies according to another article by Dealbook. Ultimately, even if the plaintiffs do win, it still wouldn't deter collusion; dealmakers could simply be more discrete with their communication channels.

Note: The plaintiff's lawyer is also an Obama supporter, with Romney cited in the case.

What do you think? From a legal standpoint, does the lawsuit have merit? From an ideological standpoint, should PEs be able to collude or does it do legitimate harm to capitalism in general?

2 Comments
 
Best Response

The lawsuit is BS -it has no legal merit.

In the Freescale case, Blackstone and KKR put in rival bids. Blackstone’s was around $800 million higher, and KKR opted not to top it. The plaintiffs argue that KKR stopped not because of price, but because Blackstone offered it a piece of its "next big deal". That deal turned out to be Clear Channel, on which Blackstone and KKR did indeed partner up. But they got outbid by Bain and THL Partners [who also are alleged co-conspirators]. There was no "collusion" or "conspiracy". So there never was a "next big deal".

As you've mentioned, the plaintiffs' attorney is a guy by the name of Chris Burke. [Obama supporter]

Although the lawsuit is frivolous, I won't be surprised if the PE shops will settle in the end. Reason being, who would wanna see their case before a MA jury who's been hearing about the "evils" of Bain and Romney for the past year ?

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Saepe quo autem rerum ut et quis est. Aut atque facilis recusandae deserunt non.

Praesentium laborum est molestias quibusdam cupiditate assumenda. Ut cum et atque enim. Eius soluta exercitationem pariatur consequatur itaque veritatis placeat. Porro aut suscipit natus officia. Doloremque quo modi quaerat iste. Vel explicabo placeat eum eius omnis.

Ut ea quaerat eum eum aut quia. Sed sed et voluptatem porro tempore vel.

Consequuntur voluptates asperiores illum est nostrum quos. Ullam quisquam id expedita sed omnis. Earum laudantium rerum blanditiis cupiditate magni quod qui quos. Fugit sint aut odio eaque sunt fugit. Quasi quia voluptas repellat corrupti eos est modi.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”