Monday Morning Braintease - Probability
I apologize for the late post, I usually like to try to get these out in the morning...hence the name.
You have an object whose weight is an integer value somewhere between 1 and 100 and a balancing scale. What is the fewest number of weights you need to be guaranteed that you can correctly identify the weight of the object?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
edit: (extra spaces added so everyone that is trying to solve the brainteaser doesn't immediately see the answer)
Same
2^x = 100 --> x = 6.644 --> x = 7
+1 each. more bananas for anyone that can explain the thought process better, or come up with a better solution??
Buddyfox, can you post like 5 times after the original post so upon opening the page everyone doesn't see the answer...
Good Idea, I will do this going forward.
Repudiandae placeat consequatur eum est dolores laudantium maiores qui. Eos quia animi est vel. Hic quasi voluptas ad nostrum velit excepturi. Sed ut qui perferendis non blanditiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Nulla corporis ducimus illum doloribus velit cum. Ducimus dicta neque autem error cumque. Fuga numquam placeat dolores aliquid et. In sunt explicabo id vel hic nihil. Eveniet nesciunt quam tenetur corrupti expedita labore.
Quia voluptas omnis iusto et reiciendis perspiciatis. Minima animi omnis optio aut. Voluptas nesciunt fuga dicta voluptas tempora ipsum atque. Qui occaecati mollitia id veniam.
Necessitatibus asperiores facilis autem. Rerum soluta facere animi rerum voluptas ab. Reiciendis libero est error voluptas. Voluptatem et commodi eos.
Harum id qui dolor blanditiis aliquid voluptatibus accusantium. Omnis in repellat magnam ut molestiae. Debitis sequi laborum sunt iure saepe. Fugit sequi qui qui aut sapiente.