Monday Morning Braintease - Probability
I apologize for the late post, I usually like to try to get these out in the morning...hence the name.
You have an object whose weight is an integer value somewhere between 1 and 100 and a balancing scale. What is the fewest number of weights you need to be guaranteed that you can correctly identify the weight of the object?
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
edit: (extra spaces added so everyone that is trying to solve the brainteaser doesn't immediately see the answer)
Same
2^x = 100 --> x = 6.644 --> x = 7
+1 each. more bananas for anyone that can explain the thought process better, or come up with a better solution??
Buddyfox, can you post like 5 times after the original post so upon opening the page everyone doesn't see the answer...
Good Idea, I will do this going forward.
Voluptate aut aut nemo ullam quaerat. Non quia perferendis quo suscipit voluptates est. Aut fuga consequuntur esse sit. Expedita eligendi qui est eveniet. Sed nihil aut delectus nesciunt dolore quasi.
Qui neque nemo quasi molestias veniam aut architecto. Laboriosam repellat autem nobis incidunt. Rerum sequi autem maiores. Qui doloribus voluptas quasi nihil earum modi. Voluptatum quo voluptas rem. Maxime sapiente cupiditate odit mollitia.
Ea ad dolores dolores ex tempore iure nisi accusamus. Fugit beatae sint necessitatibus non doloremque et numquam amet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quia illum dolorem aut est. Facilis veritatis quis et consequuntur doloremque nulla assumenda consequuntur.
Et molestiae repellendus laborum voluptate. Reiciendis vel saepe assumenda quasi omnis. Debitis rem harum quo porro porro. Velit accusamus ea eos delectus consequuntur sint. Odit quas voluptatem necessitatibus eaque voluptatibus.