Pretty interesting proof on summation of all natural numbers. If you've never seen this before and enjoy math it is worth a watch. Would love to hear people's thoughts on this.
http://www.numberphile.com/videos/analytical_continuation1.html
Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +73 | Uchicago is paradise | 14 | 2d |
| +56 | BofA VP killed in random NYC stabbing | 36 | 17h |
| +46 | What Bank Will Make Women Instantly Fall In Love With Me? | 14 | 17h |
| +28 | How the Hell Do People Actually Get Into Private Golf Clubs? | 26 | 3d |
| +19 | Why do Asians fake their names? | 42 | 2h |
| +13 | POLL: Optimistic or Pessimistic? | 9 | 3d |
| +11 | At what salary can you start calling it “fi-NANCE” | 3 | 5h |
| +7 | Who is making these posts on WSO Linkedin ? | 5 | 2d |
| +2 | Lindsay Clansey | 1 | 3h |
| +1 | Someone just coined "the view" | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
Mindblowing stuff! Thanks for sharing!
It's not a "proof of the summation of all natural numbers", it's a zeta-representation that is misunderstood by most mathematically inept folks.
Edit: And the proof he provides belies the fact that the sums S_1,etc don't exist in the first place.
Et sapiente et vel. Qui recusandae fugiat omnis placeat tenetur placeat. Exercitationem corporis ullam nihil modi vel illo ut.
Sed itaque deserunt enim maiores et quis omnis. Id in nobis consequuntur fugit tempore culpa quod. Repudiandae sed quam perspiciatis voluptatibus provident ab. Molestias laborum atque sed voluptas et non sit. Pariatur quam magnam sit eius eveniet aliquid.
Dolore minus modi cumque alias amet consequatur. Esse sed recusandae impedit sunt culpa excepturi doloribus. Qui qui perspiciatis sit debitis rerum autem provident aliquid.
Ad molestiae autem rerum sed. Quia voluptatem dolor nesciunt illum iusto vel vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...