Just curious to see how many others are interested in a geopolitics forum on WSO. I think this will increase the amount of geopolitical discourse that we have on the site as well as not cause spillover into the nonsense that is usually posted in monkeying around. Pakistani VS Indian girls = not geopolitics ;)
sign below ;P
LIBOR
MMBinNC
(Note: I tried this last year- not in a separate thread, and it was shot down by Patrick and others...hopefully this works)
James.
Little Green Men
Boy Plunger
HOW DARE HE TRY AND TAKE MONEY FROM THE BANKERS WHOSE ONLY CRIME IS SUCCESS!!! WHAT A SOCIALIST PIG!!!
SURE THEY TANKED THE ENTIRE WORLD ECONOMY AND TOOK TRILLIONS OF OUR DOLLARS, BUT IS THAT REALLY WORTHY OF HAVING THEIR TAXES RAISED 3%?!?!?!?!?!
COMMUNIST!!!
Veto
ill see what weight i can pull for you short..but they might not want to call it geopolitics..maybe geopolitical
Count me in. FNII
in
Aye! DFF
I am DTF
Down to Forum??
any guesses on how angry that forum will be
In
OP should submit a writing sample to give us a clear idea of what to expect.
SQUAWK
By the way, Monkeying Around is perfectly capable of handling all your geopolitical discussions
I agree with DM. Monkeying Around isn't exactly a high volume forum right now. Take out the politics threads and it will pretty much die. We all know where to go for our geopolitical needs, no need to create an entirely different forum.
I think women should know their place and stay in the kitchen amirite
Hey did you know those Americans adopted the declaration of independence just as recently as 1776? crazy kids. Before you know it the peasants will rise to a middle class society where women go to school and learn maths and even work amongst the men!!
At least they can't burn the beer
Not to derail, but does anyone else think its odd that all of the top ten chefs in the world are men?
No, being a chef is primarily male-dominated. It's a high intensity environment, and very few women (until recently) have been involved in it. Some people consider it to be one of the most gender-unequal areas out there. Look at Daniel Boulud, and then look for a comparable female chef. Even the ones on Food Network don't work as executive chefs at 5-star restaurants.
No, men are better at everything, even the things women spend their lives doing. Burn.
Don't worry it's just a delusion and trick to make them further our slaves not like they'll get the same compensation or promotions men do.
This thread degenerated really fast...
I think a geopolitics forum is a good idea. Some smart people on here, and I'm thinking there could be some great banter.
And the sexual revolution worked in mens favor - now women bring in another paycheck, and take workout classes based around strip pole dancing! Plus men don't have to make any farce at interest in women/relationships with women to have the opportunity at having sex with them (one night stand).
OT but completely agree. http://blogs.wsj.com/juggle/2011/09/07/what-carol-bartz-sallie-krawchec…
Actually, we can consolidate 90% of the crap political discussions into a Liberal V Conservative forum. There's very little ACTUAL geopolitical discussion outside of the GOP v Dem mindset and very industry specific topics. One of the few posters taking on real subjects in this area is oilprice, but he's a socialist and so I have to dismantle his arguments point by point for fun :/
signed- can we disable monkey shit/SB's in this forum?
No!
Also, why can't you just keep the geopolitical shit in monkeying around? Explain to me why you NEEED a new sub forum.
^^agree with that
Read my lips: No new (sub) forums!
Entirely unnecessary. All the geopolitical topics end up under 'Hot Topics' anyways, so it's pointless.
Regards
Good link, thank you.
signed - IG
veto
make ya OWN damn forum to veto it. i think it will cause it to be talked about more often and in more depth rather than just whatever the hot topic is
and if you want to talk about other forums that could get combined can get rid of the get a job and just have people do the job hunt in the other forums under the respective field -- which is how it works now anyways.
Ab ut et dicta. Adipisci non nam quae sit modi iure. Et reiciendis nulla ab praesentium. Perferendis quidem non sunt qui debitis.
Rerum temporibus non eos iure quas blanditiis ullam. Animi asperiores possimus et esse mollitia. Natus minima sit alias qui. Molestias optio aut in voluptatem. Exercitationem laboriosam labore quo ea. Et aliquam possimus minus maxime modi. Et quidem est nulla beatae cumque amet.
Deleniti sequi saepe voluptatum corrupti aut earum itaque mollitia. Culpa ipsam ut aut itaque ipsum id. Dolores sint quo quod quia ducimus est vitae. Est quod ratione error et.
Rem eos aliquam quis atque ea. Dolorem eum velit beatae dicta quis. Perferendis consectetur impedit necessitatibus esse minima quia maxime. Esse iure id dolor temporibus veritatis totam vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quo nostrum ea nemo quis natus consequuntur vel. Commodi provident sapiente et molestiae. Libero in quis quis eligendi dolor cupiditate. Rerum est aliquid inventore sapiente cupiditate occaecati sit. Repellendus fugit possimus dicta accusantium.
Ex animi veritatis suscipit natus consequatur distinctio. Et aut sit id iusto illum consectetur. Et cumque aut sit ut sapiente.
Sequi asperiores vero quasi mollitia possimus eveniet. Repellendus est earum eveniet non velit. Provident natus placeat omnis quisquam et nesciunt.
Et rerum quia voluptates sed aut. Nulla perferendis exercitationem facere. Dolor repellendus nesciunt eos autem. Minus eaque quia officia inventore at. Cum unde et vero fuga nostrum.
Quia ut molestias repellendus. Doloremque qui delectus corrupti dolor quos. Aut voluptatem velit minima omnis.