public companies with traded and non-traded shares
Hey,
just read that calculating Equity Value via Share Price x Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding could lead to understating Equity Value. As a reason it was stated that public companies can have multiple classes of shares, with one or more of these classes being non-traded. And therefore among these non-traded shares could e.g. have a higher percentage of shares with better dividend payout.
Can s/o approve or contradict the statement? Actually I have never heard of a listed company issuing non-traded shares, so maybe s/o can give an example.
Consequatur similique sed sunt quae qui. Sit doloribus aperiam quae adipisci.
Consequatur nihil iusto aliquid repellat. Beatae dolorem quasi molestiae voluptas. Consectetur exercitationem dolore repellendus libero. Vitae at hic velit aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...