Way back in early 2011, members of the U.N. Security Council had no problem getting a resolution through that authorized military force in Libya ostensibly to protect civilians from attacks by forces loyal to strongman Moammar Gadhafi. The year before, lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic were bickering over who did what and why in terms of the cancer-stricken Lockerbie bomber. This Scottish decision to release him, depending on which U.S. lawmaker you spoke with, was tied to a BP deal to drill for oil in Libya. Despite fractures in the new interim government in Tripoli and reports of renewed protests, a decision by the Italian government to quietly discuss trade relations suggests something isn't quite right in the way Western allies pick their fights. Full article at: Something's Fishy in Tripoli
Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +58 | SpaceX IPO - what are your thoughts | 13 | 16h |
| +28 | Should I use Claude or chatgpt? | 16 | 1d |
| +18 | London's future as a financial centre | 18 | 4d |
| +12 | Playing the $10K WSOP Main this year in Vegas | 0 | 1d |
| The Great Debate | 14 | 11h | |
| +9 | Will analysts give me a referral if I’m consistently #1 on all LinkedIn Puzzle Games? | 2 | 10h |
| +5 | get a model before you model | 3 | 4d |
| +5 | Pity that RU athletes can still compete | 2 | 1d |
| +3 | Finding Someone in 2026: Lost Cause? | 10 | 3d |
| +3 | Test post will be deleted automatically | 0 | 21h |
Career Resources
