Struggling in subjective/core requirement classes

I think the problem is I really can't produce what the professor is looking for (subjective grading), it's uninteresting to me and I don't see the use for my future career.

12 Comments
 

Just suck it up and do it. I know it sucks, but you don't have a choice.

Just to establish some quantitative guidelines, what do you mean by "struggling"...anything that's not an A+? Or are you talking more like "having trouble keeping passing grades"...also what's your current GPA/what will it be after this semester/year if this performance stays the same?

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 
chobani

Struggling like C+/B- range, so not failing but not doing well either. I'm at a little over 3.5 right now, and after this semester will be between 3.5-3.55.

If you can stay at 3.5 or so, you will be fine. Like others have said...the other classes may be bullshit, but take interest in those subjects anyway. Finance is the easy part...widening your interest and general knowledge level is really why you're there.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 
Best Response

Don't be one of those boring finance types who thinks all those subjective classes have no value. They provide you with some interesting knowledge and allow you to broaden your perspective, plus make you more interesting and well-informed in general. Although I chose to enter ib and really enjoy my work, my non-finance classes covered some of the most interesting things I'll ever learn about - there are usually so many options to fill those requirements that you should be able to find something genuinely interesting to you (at the least, something to round you out a bit and likely make you a more informed, interesting person). At the very least if you're adamant about taking "relevant" classes only try and find classes on things like economic history, which are usually offered and generally fulfil some core requirements.

 

I'm a history major that works on finance/accounting on the side, so maybe I can help you out with some of your issues. What about subjective courses/exams trips you up? I find I'm the opposite way, I can ace any subjective exam but struggle with multiple choice.

 

I think what challenges me the most is having to jump to a specific conclusion from certain information. In the technical courses, it's pretty easy to find a derivative/integral, or run through a DCF given the specific parameters.

But then when I take a history or a government class, I'll get a question like: "Because ABC did this in 1758, how did that change the perception of ABC?". A lot of it comes from the idea of "choose the best answer". I'm good at arguing/backing up my stances and so I automatically come up with 3 or 4 possible and reasonable answers out of the 5 choices I was given. That's why I'm bad at multiple choice for those classes, subjective essays/open response I can do well.

 

Okay, so for a prompt like that you're actually answering four separate questions.

1) What was the perception of ABC prior to 1758? 2) What did ABC do in 1758? 3) What was the perception of ABC after 1758? 4) Why did 2) cause 1) to become 3)?

The fourth question is going to be what you want to focus on to separate your answer from others in the class. 1-3 can be easily answered by regurgitating dates and summarizing the background history of the prompt. The fourth is where you can inject your own opinion and analysis which should be derived from supporting textual documents, primary source quotes or other evidence you feel supports your thesis. As long as you have a solid argument and can cite your sources you can get away with an answer that is different than what your teacher was looking for, but you have to spend an equal, if not greater, amount of time proving other possible conclusions wrong.

I recently wrote a thesis paper for a course that was worth 25% of the grade, and I spent the majority of the paper disproving conclusions different from what I thought. You should try to format your answer so that by the time you're done arguing against other conclusions your thesis should start to stand out as the obvious answer.

Another tip to help you catch all the points possible is to always always always include specific dates when you mention an event, important documents, names of people, etc.

 

Vel commodi ipsam amet perspiciatis eveniet quia. Odit maxime sapiente quae rerum ut quis minima. Cupiditate error officia necessitatibus laborum ullam officiis culpa. Amet itaque non aut. Repudiandae dolore alias mollitia sit dignissimos quidem totam. Voluptates expedita dolores doloribus ducimus mollitia fugit.

Illo qui cumque sequi doloremque illo voluptas sequi. Et totam ipsam animi cupiditate ut quidem. Consequuntur incidunt similique at hic molestiae. Qui voluptatibus quam placeat quam voluptas ut sit. Ex ratione facere nostrum accusantium impedit dolorem placeat consectetur. Reiciendis officiis est occaecati ullam quidem aut. Quae rem veritatis culpa odio.

Aliquam et illum eveniet sed vero asperiores ipsum. Aspernatur est velit molestias qui saepe recusandae corporis dolores. Tenetur qui impedit cupiditate dignissimos aspernatur illum. Numquam quos modi vitae magni rerum et sed. Et fugiat rerum dolores sed voluptates amet porro. Cupiditate esse dignissimos laudantium quam dolores ut non.

Dolorem consequatur repellendus maiores natus praesentium molestiae. Perferendis itaque sint dolorem sequi est et cum aspernatur. Velit corporis aspernatur optio in distinctio sit odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”