The Plight of Needing to Increase Endlessly

Hey guys,

I have recently been listening to a lot of podcasts due to elongated commutes into the city (Toronto transit infrastructure blows). In all of the business podcasts I was listening to (Bloomberg Surveillance, Slate Money, Marketplace, etc.) they were discussing the horrific productivity numbers released last week. They were discussing how the increase in people and from that the proportional increase in human capital has historically lead to the ever-increasing productivity in the West. However, this lead me to question how conceivable endless prosperity truly is. Can we really continue to expand our population endlessly? Does this not have negative ramifications beyond simply raising GDP? Why are all of the "elites" so inline on this issue?

Anyways, I am not privy to all of the advanced maths they use to make these models, thus I'll take there word for it. Does this concern you all as well?

3 Comments
 

Here's how I look at it. GDP growth is broken into two parts, growth from population increases and growth from productivity increases. If you have more people making shit, you make more shit; if one guy can make more shit; you make more shit.

Throughout the last century we've had extreme advances in both areas. This led to a GDP expansion never before seen on Earth. However, as you said, population can't grow forever and it especially can't grow forever in the already developed nations. So all we have left is productivity growth. We have to get better at making more with what we have. If we can't do that, our economy is at risk of stagnating and resources will flow to places that still have potential for both growth areas.

 

The issue I have is that a believe the productivity numbers (for humans) will eventually reach a maximum and given the growth rates in the West that point seems to be fairly near. However, I am not entirely sure we're doing a very good job at quantifying productivity in terms of machines, algorithms, phones, AI etc. The population side of things is just terrifying to me. The thought we should just increase the population and immigration indefinitely seems short-sited. Thanks for your input.

 
Best Response

Alias voluptatem omnis cupiditate sunt. Molestiae aut et sint quidem in facere est qui. Doloribus aut veritatis sed impedit.

Rerum eaque repellendus eaque esse iste atque. Laborum quibusdam corrupti aut ex. Deserunt pariatur eligendi nobis ut tenetur est asperiores nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”