This Family Does Not Need Big Bonuses

For those of you who read that article by the Chicago law professor claiming he was barely making ends meet on ~$350K per year, here's a family at the opposite end of the spectrum.

The Economides of Scotsdale, Arizona pride themselves on being the perennial "Cheapest Family in America," feeding a family of seven AND owning a house on an income of $44,000.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/39416868/ns/today-t…

In this video you can see them using tactics such as planning an entire month's meals before going grocery shopping, hunting for coupons, and shopping at thrift stores to save every penny they can.

While I think this family in particular is absolutely insane and shouldn't be a model for anyone, it does show us that there's no reason that people with our (or future) incomes cannot live like kings.

I'm interested to see the beratement or possible praise you guys give these quacks.

By the way, here is the father's Linkedin

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/steve-economides/5/59…

Is this a good or bad thing?

5 Comments
 
Best Response

The argument in nuanced and complex. It isn't simply a trade-off between salary/cost-of-living. Being a Professor at the University of Chicago brings a certain level of prestige, one that by-and-large (IMHO) is ego and not efficiency driven.

Folks in academic elite circles (think Ivy League profs, for example) have long been the backbone of elitist logic. It is now they and not their grant giving patrician superiors (whom they have done the bidding of for so long) who are getting the short end of the stick, so-to-speak.

It is simply a reaction based on perceived realities. On one hand I do understand the prof and the feelings of a lifetime of hard work going to waste. Reality waits for no man, however, and with the proliferation of the e-learning traditional academic institutions are bound to lose some of their luster over time and this has to be passed-down to the professors' own levels of prestige and salary. Inevitability hits hard. But it is inevitable.

 
Midas Mulligan MagooThe argument in nuanced and complex. It isn't simply a trade-off between salary/cost-of-living. Being a Professor at the University of Chicago brings a certain level of prestige, one that by-and-large (IMHO) is ego and not efficiency driven.

Folks in academic elite circles (think Ivy League profs, for example) have long been the backbone of elitist logic. It is now they and not their grant giving patrician superiors (whom they have done the bidding of for so long) who are getting the short end of the stick, so-to-speak.

It is simply a reaction based on perceived realities. On one hand I do understand the prof and the feelings of a lifetime of hard work going to waste. Reality waits for no man, however, and with the proliferation of the e-learning traditional academic institutions are bound to lose some of their luster over time and this has to be passed-down to the professors' own levels of prestige and salary. Inevitability hits hard. But it is inevitable.

What this misses, I think, is the value academics place on respect from their peers. I think that if you asked professors which they would rather have, respect/prestige from the public or acclaim from their small community of biogeochemists studying arsenic redox chemistry, 90% would choose the latter. Although, it is very possible that that my experiences in science and engineering academic circles are not applicable to law.
 

Finding coupons and planning one month's meal takes too much time. I'd rather drop by local groceries and ask for a simply 7-9$/hour job and start making more money.

 

Aut omnis et quae officiis quis totam. Repudiandae et dolor tempora est consequatur consequuntur pariatur. Modi voluptatem est commodi asperiores voluptatem incidunt.

Sint voluptatibus voluptatem dolorem fugiat atque. Eaque atque non autem officia qui delectus. Molestias quae consequatur eius voluptas et. Excepturi harum in ut quidem qui consequuntur ipsum. Vel non incidunt accusantium fugiat quae eaque dolorem. Ipsum reiciendis aut laboriosam eligendi consequatur. Qui aperiam ut consequuntur ut id quis et.

Voluptatem dolores officiis fugit sed sint voluptas. Ad quidem est sed commodi qui quis neque. Et aut molestias fuga.

Doloremque sit optio rerum occaecati nisi voluptas corporis fugit. Dolorem incidunt sit magni voluptatibus molestias sint. Occaecati et doloribus illo culpa culpa dolores.

"If you can count your money, you don't have a billion dollars." - J. Paul Getty

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”