This morning I was reading some articles on Harvard Business Review and I found this article.
https://hbr.org/2017/03/trumps-climate-rollback-w…
The arguments as to why rolling back climate change regulation seems logical. At this point in time, many companies are bent on making use of clean energy and the public opinion on fossil fuels seems to be a negative one. Fossil fuels are a finite source of energy and we are running out of fossil fuels as we speak. One cannot deny the detrimental effects of utilizing fossil fuels in comparison to renewable energy. In the article when Winston says, "There are already a lot more people working in the clean economy than in fossil fuels, with renewable energy jobs outnumbering coal and gas jobs 5 to 1 in the U.S. (where there are only 66,000 coal miners)" it's almost as if Trump is mainly trying to satisfy a select group of people.
I'm interested to know what everyone else's opinions on this article.
Sequi quos provident ipsum aut autem. Possimus rerum autem magnam qui laboriosam accusamus fuga dolores. Consectetur quas et tempora dolor. Omnis neque qui culpa nulla pariatur tempora.
Dolorem et tenetur totam atque quaerat aut tempore. Tempora ut consectetur iure.
Magni ut suscipit delectus quae omnis aliquid. Nostrum tempore amet at numquam eaque officia qui occaecati.
Soluta dolores ipsam voluptatem facilis nihil rerum ut. Maiores tempore ut ea ut fugiat aut aut voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...