Stanford comes out on top with highest wealth / alumni ratio. Harvard surprisingly poor on this metric when factoring in the immense amount of old money there.
Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +43 | I wish I went to an Ivy | 24 | 7h |
| +37 | How tall are you? | 35 | 1d |
| +27 | EpsteinBooks Dispute: Child Molestation Optimization Process | 4 | 2d |
| +18 | Favorite slop bowl for lunch? | 18 | 3h |
| +16 | Is there a solution to this spam? | 5 | 2d |
| +11 | Deldeldel | 8 | 3d |
| +10 | Andrew Tate was arrested. Thoughts? | 8 | 1d |
| Rough Breakup | 8 | 9h | |
| +7 | Ferda | 1 | 1d |
| +6 | Best UE/Seamless orders? | 1 | 4d |
Career Resources
Wait up man, UHNW individuals and Harvard has like 3x the total of stanford. This data is laid out really strangely. It is pretty meaningless, UMich beats out Harvard but only have 2k alumni....
Are MBA's in here too? I wonder how much Buffet is pushing Columbia up if you take out him as 1 alumni and drop that down to 1.45B and drops each alumni 23MM?
Yes, I know, the point is that Harvard is massive compared to, say, the likes of Princeton and given the descendants of 2 centuries of WASP aristocracy enter as legacy, modern wealth creation isn't as high as it should be compared to rivals when 'prestige ' differentials are factored in
This is, without exception, the worst graphic I've ever seen.
Quia placeat placeat molestiae et. Perspiciatis dolor sint vero nobis autem autem. Adipisci dolor et unde vel.
Vel recusandae quia dolor provident ex qui. Error inventore et quo voluptas magnam recusandae reiciendis. Aut veritatis sed laudantium reprehenderit et dolore doloribus eius. Autem atque nisi tenetur neque quae. Et necessitatibus delectus possimus at sed. Numquam ut aut ut minus. Consequatur voluptas minus est quidem amet rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...