Why don’t airplanes have individual parachutes ?

Upon engine failure, a plane has the ability to glide for the next 30 minutes through the air, slowly losing altitude.

One of the main arguments against parachutes is that we are talking about waaay different heights comprares to commercial sky diving.

So here’s my case, since airplanes can glide after engine failure, why not once they reach appropriate height have passengers jump off and parachute to safety ?

Obviously better than hoping for the best while hurling through the sky in a giant metal can towards a mountain…

25 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Teaching 180 people how to skydive while they’re panicking and free falling in the sky sounds impossible

Also where would they store the parachutes? They’d also need the eye protection to go with them and if you’re over water good luck lmao. Military trained soldiers drown while landing in water with parachutes on, chances are Betsy Lou from Kansas ain’t making it either.

Lastly how would you train a bunch of flight attendants and pilots to be skydiving instructors on the side? The pressure coming into the cabin at those altitudes would be extreme also.

Theoretically sounds like a good idea but when you break it down you can see the flaws in it, also not even to mention the legal implications that would take. Then the introduction video on the plane would take 25 fucking minutes instead of the 10 it already takes just to explain how to use a damn oxygen mask and exit the plane.

If I’m on a plane and we start going down I’m just gonna start trying to explain my previous choices to God and try to negotiate my way into Heaven before we hit the ground.

 
Banker4LIFO

Not to mention that Its gets cold pretty quick the higher up you are so you'd have to have everyone jump at a relatiely low altitude which means a shorter window. I think the temperature drops around 3.5 degrees Farenheit per 1000 ft

Yeah also you need oxygen above 15,000 feet and airliners fly at 31,000 - 38,000 feet. It is a bit of a logistical nightmare that you have to coordinate a jump under 15,000 feet as if the plane is in bad state it could be plummeting quickly, so the jump is a bit more technical. The military could do it, but you have a bunch of old people and people with kids that would just hold the jump line up considerably. Also, a small group of people are going to be 100% scared of jumping out a plane, especially at night. The staff gathering this herd of people may have to suddenly jump out due to the plane being so low. It would be a total fiasco.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Not sure about these reasons:

1) what is there to teach? can't you put the parachute like a backpack and pull the string when you're in the air to open it?

2) store them at the end of the plane. remove the last seats and put a locker with parachutes. in case of emergency people can pass them up. if you don't think people would pass them, then store them in overhead compartments - you can also make the compartments bigger or store the excess luggage at the end of the plane (remove last rows for that)

3) show instruction videos while flying. they can take the whole flight, who cares.

4) god is made up by humans, so you'll just waste your last moments in life.

The air pressure reason might be the real reason actually. I don't know much about air pressure. But I would guess if you open the door at this altitude, it might cause something like ripping out chairs and killing everybody on board - I dunno. Would love some more info on this from knowledgable people.

 

Simple pros and cons. Rather than spending so much to maintain parachute, the cost associated with carrying them (they're not that light), it makes much more sense to just keep improving the vessel itself so that accident is very unlikely. Hey in fact, airflight is the safest mode of transport with much lower casualty rate than any other transportation!

 

There is a good youtube video explaining this questions.

A while ago there were prototypes for a parachute for the entire aircraft, but it never came out of a concept phase.

A water landing as an example is inherently safer than asking people to jump out during a flight.

 

Most commercial planes have 2 engines, and while losing one is an issue they are fully capable of maneuvering and landing with the 1 engine - look it up on YouTube, this happens frequently enough. Engine failure -> slow glide to eventual fatal crash is not how any large airliner crash has ever happened. The Air France jet went nose down in a matter of minutes, same with both 737 Maxes - hard to save anyone in those situations.

Further, being on a commercial airplane is statistically one of the safest places you can be

Array
 

Just take a step up the chain and put parachutes on the plane itself. It's what Cirrus does in their general aviation aircraft, and they have a rediculously good record. 

The poster formerly known as theAudiophile. Just turned up to 11, like the stereo.
 

Past the obvious practical issues, from what I remember often if pilots are able to glide the plane to a stage where parachuting possible usually survivability pretty high e.g. Gimli Glider, Sully and TACA one with legend of a one-eyed pilot.

So I think even if could be implemented and passengers somehow get it right barely any times worth implementing since further damage to aircraft/ pilot misunderstanding situation / too little time often accident cause, at which point this is no help

 

They are WAY too heavy and bulky. Fuel cost alone would completely eliminate any business case. Airlines are working tirelessly to eliminate every ounce of unnecessary weight on aircraft. 350 parachutes would be a monumental setback for very few lives saved, if any.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

There would need to be much more training for the cabin crew. And in parallel for the passengers, their survival rates might be the same if not worse than just sitting inside the plane as they don't have any experience/training with operating a parachute before.  

 

I get what you're saying, but the risks would be far higher. individuals would panic in a real emergency because most individuals are not trained to utilize parachutes. Furthermore, it's not as easy as it seems to jump out of a plane safely because they move so quickly. It would be nearly impossible to get everyone out in a systematic manner. Most of the time, it is considerably safer to stay in the aircraft and make an emergency landing.

 

Sint tempore inventore dolorem consequuntur consectetur incidunt consequatur vitae. Pariatur omnis ipsum quisquam eius et ut in. Voluptates aut voluptas architecto debitis accusamus fugiat similique. Consequatur ducimus quibusdam vitae sunt.

Quidem deleniti ducimus rem libero velit. In nemo atque magni velit. Libero sunt officiis ullam sit dolores. Natus est sunt culpa voluptatem dolorum.

Ea qui quis dolores libero et illum. Tempora quasi quod et nisi quod. Laborum sed officia voluptatem et voluptatem sit officiis rerum. Ipsam illo at unde non velit et.

Excepturi et et consequatur minus ipsa dolor molestiae. Placeat facere nesciunt consectetur error. Cumque beatae ut unde sed. Corrupti quae officia vero sint sed. Assumenda recusandae et voluptatem perspiciatis molestiae quo.

 

Fugit aut est excepturi ullam. Quasi ea voluptatum excepturi consequuntur voluptas ipsum numquam. Cupiditate necessitatibus quaerat occaecati ea quia maxime architecto. Voluptatibus quia rem voluptates molestiae maxime necessitatibus et beatae. Inventore atque nihil suscipit rerum. Debitis vero fugit eos.

Culpa debitis in ut ut ut saepe. Non possimus natus molestiae et non eum ut. Quia culpa iure natus inventore qui aut odio.

Dignissimos in voluptas exercitationem molestiae iusto et. Qui ipsum aut enim nostrum officiis. Corrupti vel itaque consequuntur non. Voluptas omnis tempora et sit dolores id. Optio eligendi fugiat quo distinctio aperiam. Officiis dolores ut sunt labore voluptatem autem mollitia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.6%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”