If you are a baseball fan, I am sure that you know that both the New York Yankees and the Baltimore Orioles made the playoffs last week. While there was some celebration in New York on the news, it was nothing compared to the jubilation in Baltimore. The reason is not hard to fathom. In the last 16 years, the Yankees have made the playoffs in all but one, and with their payroll and heritage, Yankee fans view the playoffs as an entitlement, rather than a bonus. For Baltimore fans, whose team has not had a winning record (forget about making the playoffs) in a long time and was not expected to have one this year, it is a hugely positive surprise. It reinforces the message that it is now how well you do, but how well you do, relative to expectations, that determines the response.
- On September 27, 2012, Research in Motion came out with its earnings report, revealing that revenues dropped 31% and that it lost $235 million in the most recent quarter. Terrible news, right? The company's stock jumped 18% on the news!!
- A few weeks ago, Apple introduced its newest iPhone, selling more than 5 million iPhone 5s over the first weekend and setting itself on target to beat prior records for smart phones sold. The big story, though, was about a free Map app that Apple was offering with the iPhone, that was misbehaving. The company has lost almost $40 billion in market value in the last two weeks!!
- The audience: In providing guidance to markets, companies have conventionally thought of equity research analysts (especially sell side) as their primary audience. Ultimately, though, it is investor expectations that drive the game, and while analysts may influence those expectations, they are (in my view) more follower than leaders. The companies that are best at moulding expectations talk to investors, though they might use analysts as their messengers.
- The information: For a company to try to guide expectations, it has to have better information than investors do and be able to convey that information to markets. In particular, rather than just suggest that earnings expectations are too high, providing information on specifics such shipments or margins to back up the guidance will increase the impact it has. Companies argue that the Reg FD, the SEC's rule restricting selectively providing information to analysts, has restricted their capacity to provide meaningful guidance but note that the regulation does not prevent companies from making public disclosures to all investors.
- Credibility: To be credible, companies that try to manage expectations have to be seen as trying to do both manage them down (when they are too high) and up (when they are too low). Too many companies seem to think that managing expectations just implied lowballing earnings and revenue numbers. A study of company guidance statements, the primary device for managing earnings expectations by Factset found that almost 80% of guidance provided by firms in the third quarter of 2012 was negative & designed to lower expectations (rather than raise them). A company that always tries to talk down expectations, while beating expectations each period, is like the boy who cried wolf, more likely to be ignored than listened to.
- Results: The game's denouement occurs when the actual news (earnings or other) comes out and investors measure it relative to expectations. If investors feel that companies are fudging the number or cooking the books to deliver actual earnings that beat expectations, they will at some point stop reacting to the news.
It is the fact that information disclosures have become a game that has led some companies to choose not to play the game at all, either because they view it as a distraction from their mission of creating long term value for stockholders or because they think it is futile. In fact, my sense is that the payoff to companies from playing this game is become smaller over time and that more companies should consider the option of not playing.
Profiting from the investment game
(1) Sector or company specific knowledge: You could invest resources in learning the inner details of companies in a sector (technology, health care) and use that knowledge to make judgments on which companies will deliver positive surprises and which ones will under perform.
(2) Forensic accounting skills: Accounting statements contain clues about future earnings, and a microscopic examination of current accounting statements may provide clues about the future.
(3) Inside information: I know, I know. It is illegal, at least in the United States, but that does not stop some from trying to use it to get an advantage.
I am too lazy to immerse myself into sector specific information, don't care much for delving deep into accounting statements and both too risk averse/outside the circle to get or use inside information.
Even if you don't want to play the quarter-to-quarter expectations game, you can perhaps turn the game to your advantage in one of two ways. The first is to use it in timing your investments, buying stocks that you think will deliver long term value (and were on your list of "buys" anyway) after they fail to meet expectations. Thus, if you have always wanted to add Apple to your list, you may feel that the Maps debacle is exactly the right time to jump in. The second is to build an investment strategy of buying (selling short) stocks right after "big" expectations failures (successes), on the assumption that investors are likely to be over reacting to the news. That is a strand of contrarian investing, albeit with a shorter time horizon and I posted on this strategy a few month ago.
http://www.aswathdamodaran.blogspot.com.ar/2012/10/winning-losing-by-lo…
Non omnis dolorem et officia. Dolores sequi et a ipsa illum architecto. Aut illum et repellat voluptatem qui dolores possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Molestias quo libero qui. Et qui quasi cupiditate aperiam. Corporis molestiae eos sint omnis aut voluptate veniam. Sunt voluptatem ut id maiores voluptates. Dicta facere officia deleniti rerum. Corrupti nemo enim minima autem explicabo esse sint labore. Velit eos saepe eum. Hic aut dolores qui et vero autem.
Quibusdam eos fugiat earum adipisci. Quisquam facilis in similique nam illo. Quaerat sit earum ea harum harum ex velit. Eius autem accusantium quia porro sed ut. Vel ut unde blanditiis voluptatem.
Aliquid reiciendis adipisci dignissimos non voluptatem. Consequuntur numquam a quam dolorem esse et provident. Fugit labore animi similique. Qui provident dolores repellendus earum accusantium enim. Molestiae quia et voluptatem accusamus in soluta cum.
Quas voluptatibus eos sint natus quia possimus. Fugit fugit porro repellat et iusto. Laborum unde dolores ducimus et dolores. Cupiditate aut voluptas labore. Ipsum sit ut commodi ipsam maxime nihil necessitatibus. Labore laudantium fuga ab ratione velit non consequuntur.
Maiores quisquam dolor reiciendis labore provident iusto suscipit. Magni et dolorem quisquam consequatur.
Nobis recusandae alias atque et. Recusandae sed iste illo recusandae ut voluptates porro ipsam. Earum quia id excepturi tempore. Repellendus consequatur ipsa officiis ex. Omnis alias qui qui at dolorem perferendis fuga. Temporibus delectus nesciunt eum quisquam tenetur dolor.