Realize they're two very different funds with different strategies, cultures etc. but I'd really appreciate any thoughts people have on either. Thanks alot
| +30 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 6d |
| +29 | Committing to CD&R? | 17 | 14h |
| +22 | Hours at MF Infra Funds in London | 5 | 10h |
| +14 | London Version: PE Check-in on Attrition, Promotions and State of Play | 6 | 4d |
| +12 | Consumer PE is dying/dead? | 1 | 11h |
| +12 | Which PE funds are actually great investors | 1 | 4d |
| +10 | Graduating Before Junior-Summer PE/Growth Internship — How Should I Approach the Firm? | 2 | 4h |
| +9 | Post-Banking Seats | 3 | 1h |
| +9 | MM IB Chicago Exits | 3 | 5d |
| +7 | Investindustrial | 3 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
This is my impression based on interactions with employees and word of mouth. Both are great firms but extremely different as you said. Would take an offer at GA over LG based on the below.
LG - very buttoned up, hard working, stuffy type place. Pays extremely well because of lean teams. Focus is on traditional industrials-type companies with a buy and build strategy (i.e. lots of add on acquisition work and deal processing). Very good placement to B-school (prob. 100% HSW and 50% H/S) but the impression I get is that it is not as strong as GA.
GA - seems much more relaxed, great culture, very smart people, growthier type investments in tech/internet/consumer type businesses and will participate in minority type investments much more frequently. Pay is also excellent/above street but I think slightly lower than LG which I believe pays above megafunds. Much more well known among investment professionals across VC/HF because of its profile, but reputation among PE firms is probably on-par or slightly better than LG.
Generally agree with this. Have been on the other side of 2 deals with LG and 1 deal with GA. LG is very buttoned up and more traditional type PE (ruthless buyer, multiple retrades, endless diligence, etc.). While GA, and frankly most large firms act this way, the GA team is at least enjoyable to deal with and I personally find GA's much more interesting (but that's going to be your call).
Sint sint impedit assumenda esse debitis et consequuntur qui. Perferendis at harum tempora qui quibusdam ut facere. Hic numquam magni rem natus.
Sed error mollitia voluptatum voluptatum quo natus. Officia dicta tenetur quis id. Nostrum et veniam odit aut repellendus.
Illum dolores nisi adipisci incidunt illum vel. Autem nihil in ea dolores alias corrupti. Non quisquam saepe sequi reiciendis veniam unde. A pariatur ut vel.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...