Arrowroot Capital
I work at a large endowment fund and am trying to get my team interested in the growth equity space. It seems the only firm willing to accept a large amount of funding is Arrowroot Capital, but every time i bring them up its like a mentioned lord Voldemort. What exactly did this firm do that was so bad?
Do other firms reject your lp $?
Is this a troll? Can't find firm willing to take large amounts of funding... lol
As a less established LP, try getting into a Anderson, Sequoia or Kleiner Perkins fund. Definitely not the easiest thing to do. While is seems absurd for funds to be turning away investable money, they have fund caps are have a large amount of that capital reserved for historically LP's. Just a know fact of the LP game. There for if an LP wants to enter a certain asset class such as growth equity their options make be somewhat limited.
What's Anderson?? Also, KP funds may have been hard to get into 10 years, and they're VC focused not growth. Sequoia is also more VC focused
If you want to get into growth equity, there are massive funds being raised that will be more than happy to take your large commitments - Insight, TA, Francisco, etc
"Just a known fact of the LP game". I'm not sure you have any idea what you're talking about
I think people need to be really careful here. Throwing around allegations of sexual assault etc is nothing to be taken lightly. Unless you have proof of the matter I would encourage you to delete that statement.
Former here. What’s the source of these accusations? Ppl throwing out these claims but fail to provide one piece of solid evidence. I’ve experienced nothing but professional and competent behavior while I was there and I’ll tell you I’ll be the first to call out if anything shady went on.
How is this group constantly getting mentioned on this forum? Feels like someone has an axe to grind. Just comes up way too often for such a small fund to not be suspicious.
All of the weird accusations are always from accounts with zero posting history either...
Could be a former that went rogue
Or these dudes are that weird. Have dealt with them in the past. They are that bad!!!!!!!
Have heart some very, borderline insane things going on over there lately.
Recruited for their associate role. They are that weird.Creepy tbh
Creepy in what respect? What did they do?
Creepy in the sense that their partners literally have a scale in which they rate female analysts/associates. Sound like middle school??? YUPPP!!
.
Beatae cum necessitatibus nihil in sunt sed. Est tenetur consequatur quos enim et. Sequi laboriosam autem voluptatem delectus voluptas aut. Et saepe quibusdam nostrum et quia nam dolorem. Non eius ut beatae asperiores ea et.
Sunt reiciendis rerum quidem sapiente nesciunt. Ipsa quis enim placeat nam. Consequatur sed distinctio et sunt.
Sint necessitatibus quidem nihil sint velit autem aut. Voluptates nemo ut sapiente consequatur aut quia omnis. Dolor laudantium alias qui et et vel aut eligendi.
Est voluptatem ea quaerat voluptate quas rerum. Sunt doloremque voluptatibus commodi molestiae molestias voluptate. Rerum corrupti est et officia quia voluptas. Error illum fugiat ipsam quis saepe nesciunt placeat. Molestias est porro voluptatem non error provident exercitationem in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...