I work at a large endowment fund and am trying to get my team interested in the growth equity space. It seems the only firm willing to accept a large amount of funding is Arrowroot Capital, but every time i bring them up its like a mentioned lord Voldemort. What exactly did this firm do that was so bad?
| +60 | Working on Juneteenth | 35 | 1d |
| +25 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 2d |
| +24 | Future of PE | 2 | 18m |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 1d |
| +19 | Weighing exit from LMM PC/PE | 4 | 1d |
| +15 | Healthcare PE | 6 | 3d |
| +14 | KKR comp for Principal | 17 | 1h |
| +11 | Reality of the move from LMM to MM | 2 | 5d |
| +9 | MBA and Private Equity | 3 | 2d |
| +9 | LMM/MM PE London | 5 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Do other firms reject your lp $?
Is this a troll? Can't find firm willing to take large amounts of funding... lol
As a less established LP, try getting into a Anderson, Sequoia or Kleiner Perkins fund. Definitely not the easiest thing to do. While is seems absurd for funds to be turning away investable money, they have fund caps are have a large amount of that capital reserved for historically LP's. Just a know fact of the LP game. There for if an LP wants to enter a certain asset class such as growth equity their options make be somewhat limited.
What's Anderson?? Also, KP funds may have been hard to get into 10 years, and they're VC focused not growth. Sequoia is also more VC focused
If you want to get into growth equity, there are massive funds being raised that will be more than happy to take your large commitments - Insight, TA, Francisco, etc
"Just a known fact of the LP game". I'm not sure you have any idea what you're talking about
I think people need to be really careful here. Throwing around allegations of sexual assault etc is nothing to be taken lightly. Unless you have proof of the matter I would encourage you to delete that statement.
Former here. What’s the source of these accusations? Ppl throwing out these claims but fail to provide one piece of solid evidence. I’ve experienced nothing but professional and competent behavior while I was there and I’ll tell you I’ll be the first to call out if anything shady went on.
How is this group constantly getting mentioned on this forum? Feels like someone has an axe to grind. Just comes up way too often for such a small fund to not be suspicious.
All of the weird accusations are always from accounts with zero posting history either...
Could be a former that went rogue
Or these dudes are that weird. Have dealt with them in the past. They are that bad!!!!!!!
Have heart some very, borderline insane things going on over there lately.
Recruited for their associate role. They are that weird.Creepy tbh
Creepy in what respect? What did they do?
Creepy in the sense that their partners literally have a scale in which they rate female analysts/associates. Sound like middle school??? YUPPP!!
.
Beatae maiores ut aut explicabo voluptatum vel tempora amet. Saepe qui sint omnis aut est. Ut pariatur sed illo dolorem ut voluptas quaerat.
Et ut harum ipsa vel. Earum dolorem dolor eius aperiam.
Ut magni facere nostrum voluptates et. Aliquid ut libero commodi explicabo quia quisquam. Et qui rerum veritatis quaerat error non. Nulla illo natus rerum assumenda modi facere.
Labore atque provident impedit quas. Doloribus rerum dolores aperiam libero. Illo deserunt ex nesciunt eligendi non ipsum. Commodi expedita ut debitis qui. Doloribus et reiciendis nemo quos voluptas voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...