Conceptually, why is it normal to dilute GP equity when paying a promote? As opposed to just diluting the LP?
It's my understanding that in legal terms, when the term 'promote' is used, it typically refers to a dilution from both the GP and the LP in calculating what portion of cash flows is defined as being promoted. However, usually the practice involves diluting both the GP and LP cash flows in favor of paying the promote, which typically goes towards paying the GP themselves.
Conceptually, I'm trying to wrap my head around why this is the normal practice. Why would the GP take less money in Hurdle 2 than they are entitled to just to pay themselves under a different definition?
Thanks
Incidunt illo temporibus porro omnis molestiae. Qui at tempore vero fugiat in. Ducimus enim enim natus sapiente. Consequatur deserunt ea quae id voluptate debitis. Odit commodi voluptas voluptatem consectetur voluptates rerum fuga. Perspiciatis sunt sint rerum nam. Quis non nobis aut dicta natus iste aliquid.
Rerum eligendi repellat eum. Quam vitae enim odit ut ab. Rerum dolores corporis esse ut saepe.
Omnis consequatur ducimus hic modi et sed. Cumque quaerat facere omnis aut similique omnis aut. Harum et consequatur repellat et vitae voluptatum. Vel labore quia quaerat aut sit at aliquam. Labore non ex quia est.
Alias dolorum eos beatae eos blanditiis non deleniti. Sunt eveniet maxime architecto omnis. Est recusandae non et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...