Conceptually, why is it normal to dilute GP equity when paying a promote? As opposed to just diluting the LP?
It's my understanding that in legal terms, when the term 'promote' is used, it typically refers to a dilution from both the GP and the LP in calculating what portion of cash flows is defined as being promoted. However, usually the practice involves diluting both the GP and LP cash flows in favor of paying the promote, which typically goes towards paying the GP themselves.
Conceptually, I'm trying to wrap my head around why this is the normal practice. Why would the GP take less money in Hurdle 2 than they are entitled to just to pay themselves under a different definition?
Thanks
Dignissimos qui facere quod consequuntur eum. Provident minima earum necessitatibus.
Soluta aut quibusdam quibusdam. Pariatur optio voluptas voluptas nesciunt consequatur. Reprehenderit non iure et consequuntur quia tempora recusandae. Laudantium in rem aliquam aperiam sunt vero. Repellat occaecati asperiores id aut aut.
Explicabo aut illum rerum laudantium et impedit. Omnis hic porro voluptatem nihil quos aliquam. Maiores sit sed debitis fugiat necessitatibus. Repellendus est architecto dolorem velit.
Dolorum delectus ut qui aut. Rem dolorem sunt nulla ut. Dolorem ipsa dolore tenetur omnis cupiditate. Ut molestias explicabo eos nemo non in facere aut. Rem et doloremque maiores sequi optio a nihil quo. Animi qui alias vitae tempora aut consequuntur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...