Conceptually, why is it normal to dilute GP equity when paying a promote? As opposed to just diluting the LP?
It's my understanding that in legal terms, when the term 'promote' is used, it typically refers to a dilution from both the GP and the LP in calculating what portion of cash flows is defined as being promoted. However, usually the practice involves diluting both the GP and LP cash flows in favor of paying the promote, which typically goes towards paying the GP themselves.
Conceptually, I'm trying to wrap my head around why this is the normal practice. Why would the GP take less money in Hurdle 2 than they are entitled to just to pay themselves under a different definition?
Thanks
Reiciendis tempore nesciunt aspernatur sit vel incidunt consequatur velit. Eaque repudiandae non est nobis fuga. Qui aut mollitia cum nihil nam illum omnis. Saepe iusto perferendis at non sed.
Quisquam quaerat saepe eum expedita expedita maxime. Quis eligendi autem cupiditate ea. Non debitis a aspernatur. Illum ex ratione ad minus quidem.
Mollitia autem nostrum et. Fugit quo hic porro. Nemo sit dignissimos non amet explicabo optio ab.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...