Help: Strat / Mgmt Consulting or RX Consulting Provide Relatively Better Exits into PE?
At a T2 consulting firm, and am lucky enough to have lateral offers on hand for both MBB and T1 RX Consulting . I'm looking to exit into PE down the line, preferably into deal team, and secondarily into ops team (MM / UMM / MF). My question to you guys is this: which of the two offers would set me up better to accomplish this?
Now, a couple of footnotes:
- I know RX consulting is more linked to distressed PE and MBB to traditional PE, but assuming all else equal, I’m asking which path offers a better overall chance to exit into PE (e.g., if RX gives 80% distressed and 20% traditional PE exits, and MBB 60% traditional and 20% distressed, RX would be better due to higher total PE exit probability)
- Since MBB and strategy consulting have many more professionals than RX consulting, they naturally produce more PE exits overall. I’m interested in the likelihood of exiting into PE on a per-applicant basis, adjusting for the larger applicant pool from strat/mgmt to compare on equal footing.
- Does it change with a target undergrad to MBB / RX or non-target undergrad to MBB / RX, or at that point does your experience matter more?
Way easier from MBB, not even close and more optionality too. Lot of shops unfortunately won't look at consultants past MBB, including distressed investors
Agree, MBB hands down. The training and experience (especially if you do the PEG group/CDD work) are 100x more relevant.
Interesting, so your point is that MBB would lead to more guaranteed exit chances across the board (for ops + investing)?
Yes, the brand carries a ton of weight (similar to the credentialing of a top tier MBA). The seats are more competitive to get than RX and exit opportunities reward accordingly IMO, unless you specifically want to stay in turnaround ops, but otherwise I think you’re specializing too early.
Makes sense, thanks. Also, and this is moreso a function of the industry itself, but I think that RX co, atleast for the past couple of years has been a pretty obscure industry, and didn't have nowhere near the same level of coverage that MBB or mgmt consulting in general did (maybe because they traditionally didn't hire out of undergrad). I feel like that'll measurably change in the near future as the new analyst classes that got hired out of undergrad mature and exit, but atleast for someone in my position it's like searching for a needle in a haystack bc even on WSO there's a lot of conflicting opinions about exits from the indstry.
At a relatively smaller PE firm that deals with distressed co's and the way I see it, If your endgame is PE (deal team first, ops second), then on a per-capita basis, T1 RX likely edges out MBB for pure probability of landing some PE seat, but the flavor of that PE will skew heavily distressed / special sits; so if you’re cool with that being your main path, it’s a strong play. MBB’s advantage is brand recognition across all of PE, especially traditional buyout shops, and it keeps your optionality wider, plus, even for distressed PE, MBB alum still get looks. The “per-applicant” odds tilt toward RX because fewer people gun for PE from there and the skills map cleanly to a subset of funds, but MBB’s sheer breadth of exits and alumni network can be just as powerful, especially if you network early and aggressively. Undergrad pedigree matters less once you’re already in either seat, both brands will overwrite most undergrad concerns, but at the very top MM/UMM/MF shops, a target background plus MBB gives you a smoother narrative for traditional PE. In short: RX = higher hit rate into distressed/special sits PE, MBB = more routes into all flavors of PE, slightly harder odds per head but bigger universe. Pick based on which type of fund you’d actually be happiest grinding at for 80 hours a week.
TLDR: Net-net, if you want to maximize overall PE exit probability per applicant, RX might actually have the edge but if you’re dead set on traditional buyout, MBB’s still the safer bet.
Anyone who thinks different / similar / any other opinions please feel free to chime in
TYSM, super helpful
Porro minus est doloribus assumenda vel iste expedita. Quia vero suscipit et laudantium nulla. Non eius vero totam ut sequi.
Ipsam possimus assumenda animi rerum asperiores rem omnis. Porro asperiores eum commodi nam consequatur pariatur delectus. Ad voluptate eos nihil ex sed facere tempora enim. Aliquid velit consequatur voluptatem nulla quia. Et beatae autem ullam pariatur est non. Ut nostrum vero deleniti aut quidem aut aut voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...