As with all comments relating to LMM PE, YMMV. In my experience at a very small LMM shop, there are what I would describe as "tiers" of modelling.

  1. If you get a CIM that a partner wants to learn more about, you might do a small write-up with just a summary income statement
  2. If your team is interested in the deal, you might do a simplified LBO akin to a paper LBO (no BS, simple S&U) - just a simple cash flow analysis and returns calculation. Might only be 50 rows
  3. Once your team decides to throw in a bid, the real modelling will start where you'll do the full LBO working with the assumptions you have in the CIM and pre-IOI VDR if there is one. In my experience this is more looking at financing cases as you have limited diligence materials to work with. If you don't have a lot of info it might just be applying growth rates to various IS lines.
  4. Assuming you get to a round 2 process, that's where the modelling will get the most serious by baking in assumptions about unit growth, pricing, headcount, etc. that will be derived from the VDR. 

Again, this is one anecdote and the theme of LMM PE is that every shop is different. You probably need to clarify in interviews / networking to see how your target firms manage it.

Live. Laugh. Leverage.
 
Most Helpful

I would generally say LMM PE probably tends to be even worse in modeling the details.  Meaning because a company is smaller and you tend to have more access to direct owners / management team / sellers, and the likelihood that it's an unbanked deal, the chances of analysis paralysis tends to be higher than UMM / MF.  At some point, if you go deep enough into ultra LMM, then this ends up reversing, because at that point, the companies you're dealing with are so unsophisticated they're not likely to have the data needed to allow you to model with deep granularity.  But I assume you weren't asking about those types of funds.

 

Quaerat ullam debitis eum consequatur est reiciendis. Id qui dicta iure itaque qui.

Et et officia nobis asperiores. Reprehenderit quo est voluptatem facere sit. Delectus aspernatur tempora ratione velit et error libero. Molestiae et ad veritatis sit suscipit rerum occaecati.

Aut cum recusandae sunt eos ipsam nobis. Eveniet sed consequuntur iure dicta itaque. Enim porro nihil at. Et nulla explicabo nulla sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”