Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +106 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 34 | 1d |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 13 | 2d |
| +36 | MF Tech PE 2026 | 8 | 1h |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 3d |
| +22 | Do you think PE has actually helped you become a better entrepreneur? | 8 | 21h |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 13 | 1d |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 5d |
| +16 | Portfolio Marks | 8 | 18h |
| +15 | Overwhelmed by amount of data / granularity | 3 | 2d |
| +15 | DELETE | 1 | 2d |
Career Resources
about tree fiddy
very helpful.....
Hahahahahahaha 😂 amazing reference
You'd have to ask for the margin and the overhead to get an accurate answer. But throwing those out the window for now, I believe the answer should be: enough bread to satisfy 50 customers. This is the point at which anything in addition would provide a comparatively negative probability-adjusted profit (again, ignoring costs for simplicity since you'd need to ask for this).
My logic is 50 customers x $1 per customer = $50 of proceeds. 50 customers = 50% probability (continuing the trend of a 1% probability decline for each additional customer). Thus $50 x 50% probability = $25 profit.
If I were to take any additional customers, then I'd theoretically be put in a position where the probability is I'll make less money. For example, 51 customers. 51 customers x $1 = $51 in proceeds. $51 proceeds x 49% probability = $24.99 profit.
Therefore, since $25 profit > $24.99, I'm better off maximizing my probability-adjusted proceeds by stopping at 50 loafs of bread to satisfy 50 customers.
Anyone disagree?
I agree with you
Sapiente dolor earum harum aut iusto perferendis totam. Atque quam autem illo iste voluptatem. Numquam voluptas officia eaque sed dolores eum minima. Repellat et debitis consequuntur corrupti. Quae iure et soluta dignissimos deleniti sed. Consequatur quisquam laudantium quos autem.
Sapiente eum adipisci ea impedit. Ut quia occaecati temporibus recusandae sapiente qui. Eos dignissimos minus odit qui sequi vitae sapiente. Qui id tempore consequatur ut. Id itaque ut repellat autem deleniti molestias nesciunt. Recusandae illo delectus vitae vel rerum totam rem. Possimus eligendi voluptate quos ipsum et.
Necessitatibus earum assumenda et. Nihil quis corporis ab sed ut. Corporis non consequatur dolorem tempore architecto doloribus cum fugit.
Voluptas tenetur voluptas quas autem ab aliquid magnam neque. Reiciendis nostrum qui unde quo ea reprehenderit. Vitae accusantium dolorem voluptas eius praesentium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...