PIK Interest
Has anyone ever come across a "borrower friendly" note where a portion of the interest PIK's, but the total coupon payment remains fixed, despite the PIK accrual?
Has anyone ever come across a "borrower friendly" note where a portion of the interest PIK's, but the total coupon payment remains fixed, despite the PIK accrual?
| +74 | Cognitive decline | 21 | 3h |
| +54 | Vibe-Working in Finance with AI ? What about you | 31 | 18m |
| +49 | Del | 26 | 1d |
| +42 | PE VP: Thoughts on Quitting with Nothing Lined Up? | 9 | 2h |
| +18 | Acquisition Deal Structure: More Cash at Close vs. Smaller Equity Rollover in a Holdco | 3 | 2d |
| +18 | How do PE funds choose their advisors? | 7 | 3d |
| +17 | Is buyside worth it if most associate programs are 2 and out? | 4 | 3d |
| +13 | How Cooked is Software PE? | 1 | 1d |
| +13 | Management consulting or munis? | 6 | 3d |
| +12 | Indian PE Landscape | 2 | 1h |
Career Resources
What do you mean by coupon payment remains fixed? That makes no sense to me. PIK usually increase your principal amount. Therefore, your payment in $ amount increase over time. I guess coupon rate will always stay the same as a percentage of principal? In this case, I'm case the payment is in fixed $ despite that principal increase?
I guess what I’m getting at is a scenario similar to the following: - $1,000 note with a fixed coupon payment of $100 but the option for a set period of time to PIK 25% of the interest
For a standard PIK instrument, this would increase your total interest expense as the principal is increasing, but was just wondering if anyone had ever seen a case where the lender just allows the PIK portion to be paid off at maturity but wouldn’t increase the interest expense (the “$100”)?
In the scenario you laid out, the investor / lender would be foregoing a portion of the cash interest today to be paid the exact same amount in the future. That's finance 101 (time value of money), no one would agree to that. That's why PIK interest compounds
Yeah, would be really strange to accept that IMO.
Why couldn't they just increase the PIK interest rate such that it equaled the yield at maturity to that of a lower rate with compounding? As long as there are prepayment penalties, I don't see an effective difference.
You mean simply non compounding? I've seen a PIK accrual without compounding but I wouldn't call it borrower friendly... it was a 30% interest rate.
No clue why any lender would do that.
Velit voluptates consequatur saepe temporibus neque consectetur. Id id qui repellendus rerum.
Sit ad nihil voluptates alias. Eum autem laboriosam perspiciatis similique saepe aspernatur nam facere. Ut et error voluptas a tempora aut.
Optio veritatis illo omnis aut non. Provident odio incidunt nesciunt tempora perferendis tempore eos similique. Sed qui est quae rerum voluptas doloribus. Vel dolorum sint omnis repellendus.
Vel reprehenderit et asperiores consectetur. Sed qui necessitatibus sed omnis mollitia enim. Aspernatur est perferendis blanditiis similique culpa ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...