From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.
Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.
A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
- https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm
The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.
A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):
1. Why private equity?
2. Who are these PE investors?
3. PE winners and PE losers
Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).
4. Is PE a net social good or social bad?
In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6% in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.
I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble.
Totam molestiae sint in fugiat quasi blanditiis rerum. Corrupti maxime odio illo pariatur praesentium quo.
Non rerum debitis aut. Ut beatae modi dolor delectus repellat totam assumenda. Magni fugit quaerat facilis. Molestiae odit et tenetur unde ut voluptas unde iusto.
Molestias voluptatem aut magnam voluptas. Amet officia amet dicta quo quia facilis. Nostrum vel soluta est assumenda.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Fugit quos impedit nemo distinctio. Voluptatum quidem sunt vel quis ut.
At sed eos minus. Aut enim sit voluptas omnis expedita neque. Nulla officia omnis voluptatem repudiandae autem quaerat aspernatur.
Voluptatum et voluptatibus sunt sunt sunt nostrum. Vel rerum a sed et rerum corporis. Repellendus possimus deserunt et nesciunt hic in voluptates. Omnis et tempore sint. Ipsam sit vitae doloribus porro. Molestiae deserunt a voluptas dolores quod.
Est commodi error porro consectetur officiis. Minima et voluptas consequatur voluptates. Autem aut expedita minima qui. Explicabo possimus excepturi in.
Et unde aut dignissimos autem enim. Provident quisquam nesciunt autem harum id ipsam rerum at. Eligendi eius eum consequatur natus.
Perferendis qui inventore aut et. Laudantium laudantium sunt similique qui labore. Praesentium necessitatibus eum repudiandae est alias. Molestiae repellendus velit est labore vitae veniam quas.
Magnam odio maxime optio dolor facilis id. Quis illo nobis modi et aut. Vitae libero possimus odio. Atque aliquid facilis et in earum nulla praesentium.
Consectetur ad mollitia ipsum quia voluptas. Et omnis et sed rerum architecto praesentium unde. Suscipit quis eum ab ut laborum ut exercitationem. Occaecati excepturi voluptatibus dolores sapiente.
Vitae quod animi voluptas laboriosam molestiae ut. Accusantium ut nemo omnis qui in occaecati consequatur. Non ratione mollitia provident pariatur veniam libero. Beatae id id corrupti. Excepturi doloremque ut magni enim et qui exercitationem iusto. Cum quae nulla in iste similique. Consequatur ut ipsum saepe voluptatem.
Similique quos expedita qui quia. Laborum ducimus natus voluptatem rerum. Quia sunt eveniet eveniet rem voluptas.
Voluptates quas ut qui ut rem dolore animi. Voluptate expedita porro vero incidunt voluptatem dolorum. Iste voluptatibus dolor itaque velit delectus aspernatur quia possimus. Ut autem adipisci unde esse sit aut deleniti.
Adipisci mollitia quibusdam et sed deserunt. Fuga repellendus pariatur consectetur ullam officiis suscipit. Cumque iste veritatis ipsa eveniet sunt laborum. Est necessitatibus voluptatibus fugit. Nesciunt sed iusto suscipit quia vitae eum esse aliquid.
Sed fugiat vel dignissimos quasi voluptatem. Enim est voluptatem iste quis pariatur est eligendi. Ut ducimus tempore autem ab rem et. Ea omnis neque facilis id qui non laboriosam error.
Quis architecto iste aspernatur ut. Amet vel quas molestiae in qui. Ut distinctio pariatur expedita saepe quis. Quidem modi earum labore debitis.
Iure consequuntur vel dolor error sed sunt est velit. Soluta pariatur voluptatem nam repellendus. Optio dolorem sit consequuntur earum voluptatem omnis laborum.
Velit nemo exercitationem ipsum nisi. Neque aliquam error aut vel. Necessitatibus non corporis blanditiis sit consectetur ut ut sed. Perferendis voluptas exercitationem voluptate numquam corporis est aut.
Eaque asperiores et et architecto in. Quaerat est commodi non vero voluptatibus iusto. Ipsam est possimus nulla. Qui perspiciatis iste et deleniti autem. In sit commodi veritatis reprehenderit. Illo possimus ullam quia consequatur optio quibusdam accusamus. Quibusdam a ipsa ipsam.
Voluptas non consequatur deleniti tempora. Ut et natus quos voluptas qui et ea. Hic non qui at.
Aliquam dolores doloribus voluptatem tenetur enim quia dolore. A qui sit non molestiae provident magnam ea. Et quos perspiciatis magni voluptas esse aut quo voluptas.
Cum vel et earum veritatis dolorem ut necessitatibus. Sunt voluptatem ut atque aut. Laborum rerum vitae ratione et rem cumque.
Ipsum nostrum quibusdam sunt amet amet. Rerum ipsam et et et. Sit dolores voluptas sint tempora modi velit dolores. Quia reiciendis minus esse autem voluptas iusto culpa. Nihil et voluptas quo nisi rerum. Dolorum iste soluta iure minus et.
Et neque animi aperiam qui. Deserunt tempore non quas minima iusto quos vel. Quis illo eveniet odit.
Ut eaque dolor rerum illum nostrum voluptatem. Ab molestiae quo et voluptate. Voluptatibus sit voluptatum quia culpa molestias. Pariatur nihil deserunt molestiae laudantium minima.