During high school, I got a 1740 (out of 2400) on my SAT and a 27 on ACT. I know that they aren't good scores but I was able to get an offer at an "EB" and will be starting soon. I read that they might ask for my scores during PE recruitment and that these scores might ding me. Should I consider retaking the SAT/ACT so that wouldn't be a problem?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +71 | Does anyone believe their firm has a true competitive edge | 36 | 12h |
| +42 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 11 | 2d |
| +24 | Do you regret doing PE? | 17 | 8h |
| +24 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 6 | 6h |
| +23 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 19h |
| +14 | Francisco Partners Fundraise | 6 | 11h |
| +14 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 6 | 2h |
| +14 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 3 | 3d |
| +12 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 9 | 12h |
| MBA to EM Infra Investing? | 3 | 23h |
Career Resources
If a fund is stupid enough to consider high school test scores a meaningful performance metric, after you've gone to school, recruited for IB, worked at an elite boutique etc, are they really a fund you want to work for?
Edit: My comment probably sounded harsher than I meant it to. If we've learned anything from the GS13, recent suicides etc, its that there's more to life than money and prestige. If a fund or recruiter really considers your high school test scores a make it or break it performance indicator given your otherwise very impressive resume, I'd think that's a good indication that they're assholes. Life is too short.
Full disclosure, I'm not in IB or PE. Currently working 40 hours a week in a BB investment research group with great culture and loving it.
I personally think acing the GMAT is a better approach to this issue vs. retaking a test meant to be taken by high schoolers. Will benefit you even if you don't go to business school (and obviously benefits you if you do).
I have taken the GMAT for a plus one masters program and I didn’t do great either. The reason why I said SAT/ACT because I assumed they are much easier than the GMAT and would be looked at the same way during PE recruiting.
Take a grad school exam instead—GRE or GMAT at a top percentile should suffice/ work as a fill in. Say you didn’t take the act or can’t remember.
Don’t think it’s worth re-taking, but I wouldn’t show those scores on my resume tbh
Never got asked my SAT scores. I recruited mainly for LMM funds, although did some sizable MM's too.
If it’s below a 30, yes. Headhunters will ask you your score. Take 1-2 weeks to study math / tactics and you’ll likely get a 30+, assuming you’re better at reading now than when you were 16.
Was in a similar boat with a score lower than yours. When headhunters asked for my score I just said I didn't have it available or didn't know it. Was never pressed on the issue - if you're at an EB you are more than qualified. And any funds that seriously care about something from when you were 16 is a red flag anyway.
Quibusdam iure rerum et nihil. Ea ducimus non modi tenetur dolores blanditiis. Fugit necessitatibus molestiae voluptatem ut quia quisquam eius cumque. Consectetur ut sit laudantium quidem minus dolor voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...