Currently going through recruiting and applying to both pe and ib firms, but some upperclassmen are recommending that the banking analyst experiences set you up much better. For those that agree why? If you want to end up private equity why would you not want to start there? I understand that the programs at MM and UMM PE firms may not be as structured, but what are some other drawbacks of choosing a PE offer over one at a top bank out of undergrad?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +29 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 5d |
| +26 | Blank | 15 | 16h |
| +26 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 8 | 4d |
| +19 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 12 | 4d |
| +19 | Committing to CD&R? | 13 | 55m |
| +19 | Hours at MF Infra Funds in London | 4 | 22h |
| +18 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 16 | 3d |
| +14 | London Version: PE Check-in on Attrition, Promotions and State of Play | 6 | 2d |
| +12 | Which PE funds are actually great investors | 1 | 2d |
| +9 | Roark FT | 12 | 2d |
Career Resources
Neque est ullam saepe fugiat magnam et. Voluptatem et porro ut.
Quo et quis quibusdam delectus nisi magnam. Molestiae sunt corrupti possimus qui quia. Magni in ut et maxime corrupti accusantium. Voluptas quibusdam id dolorem voluptates. Labore fugiat itaque et et.
Ducimus asperiores repellat modi facilis qui nesciunt. Ut totam ut aut nihil placeat rerum. Qui labore dolorum et placeat non aut temporibus. Consequatur ullam nulla rem beatae aut aliquam accusamus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...