Any thoughts on comp at associate and senior levels? Would expect it to be higher than traditional direct lending. Key players post SVB seem to be Triple Point, Runway, Trinity, Hercules. Any info on culture of these shops and career flexibility / exits would be appreciated too.
| +36 | What are you actually using AI for in PE? | 14 | 1d |
| +33 | Best industry/job for entrepreneurship? | 11 | 3d |
| +23 | Firm not transferring me to NYC | 12 | 5h |
| +20 | Burn Out in PE - What Comes Next? | 3 | 4d |
| +19 | Laid off from MM PE - Seeking Help | 8 | 2h |
| +15 | Buyside in London with nice WLB and pay | 15 | 1d |
| +12 | Value Creation Initiatives (That aren't add-ons) | 3 | 2d |
| +10 | Undergrad summer PE analyst positions | 3 | 5d |
| +9 | Realistic path to Capital Solutions/Spec Sits Groups from LevFin at a BB? | 0 | 48m |
| +9 | Question about HH 2028 | 2 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Have dealt with a few of these firms from the borrower side and understand the model pretty well. It’s an interesting sector and product, but not a seat I would want personally.
The names you listed are all funds—the other players in the space are banks. SVB is still writing term sheets, lots of smaller or regional banks are active (Stifel for example), and JPM is building out a VD team. Banks offer much better terms than funds—saw a bank TS recently priced at prime + 20 bps with 10 bps of warrants in the borrower whereas fund term sheets are often in the range of prime + 500-1000 bps with 50-100 bps of warrant coverage. Most of the funds are/have BDCs, so you can look at their loan portfolios—it’s usually a pretty motley crew of startups.
Underwriting in the space is…different. The VD line will usually be paid back using funds from the next equity fundraise (at which point lender often extends/upsizes instead), so a lot of the diligence is really on who the VCs are and if they are committed to investing in the next round. Company financials and business model are obviously diligenced as well, but there’s not exactly a lot of modeling going on during underwriting—they’re largely piggybacking on the VCs diligence.
One interesting adjacent trend right now is the rise of tech debt and structured equity funds launched by some of the MFs and crossover equity investors. They are focused on unicorns for now, writing checks that are much bigger than what VD funds can do. Will be interesting to see if any eventually go down market and squeeze the traditional VD lenders.
Thanks, Sbed. If you have any insight on the comp & culture of these firms would be great. Also what are typical exits? Structured equity & the tech lending group of PC shops?
Not really sure on these points given I’m on the other side of the table. Culture is firm dependent as always. These are fairly small funds so comp isn’t gonna be fantastic at junior levels.
I’ve seen more senior guys move to opportunistic funds with a broader mandate, but likely harder to do at the associate level—you’re not getting strong underwriting reps in. As with most buyside roles, this is the exit opp for most people.
Incidunt amet quibusdam ex et repudiandae corrupti. Ut voluptas eaque non corrupti veritatis in.
Qui sunt ex voluptas quaerat. Consectetur quasi minima accusamus velit eligendi et. Dolore quo in rerum aliquam rerum fuga magnam. Praesentium et optio eaque nisi commodi rem rerum.
Est asperiores tempore autem. Blanditiis fugit architecto aspernatur esse quos et. Doloremque iusto maxime minus quisquam. Ut enim iure quod exercitationem sit sint ad iste. Sunt perferendis commodi sequi eum sed molestiae at. Dolores officiis sed ea voluptatum aut sed tempore facilis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Alias repudiandae omnis similique exercitationem iusto sequi numquam. Inventore molestiae eos magni possimus. Aperiam nihil vel corrupti reprehenderit hic. Ab alias rerum qui qui placeat omnis. Est officia dignissimos unde inventore voluptatibus hic facilis.
Quisquam placeat quibusdam voluptatem enim. Quia possimus nulla quidem animi.