Any thoughts on comp at associate and senior levels? Would expect it to be higher than traditional direct lending. Key players post SVB seem to be Triple Point, Runway, Trinity, Hercules. Any info on culture of these shops and career flexibility / exits would be appreciated too.
| +30 | London MF REPE is paradise | 2 | 7m |
| +26 | The Difference Between a Good Business and a Good Acquisition | 7 | 1d |
| +18 | Career / Life Crossroads | 5 | 1d |
| +14 | Opinions on DTCP? | 5 | 4h |
| +14 | Partners misalignmet common? | 4 | 2d |
| +11 | Late 20’s career switch into IB/PE/REPE -realistic? | 2 | 3h |
| +11 | on-cycle possible after lateraling? | 2 | 1d |
| +10 | How to prep for HH calls? | 3 | 4d |
| +10 | PE Associate Recruiting from a PE Analyst Program | 3 | 14h |
| +9 | What to do - advice needed for incoming 27 associate | 2 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Have dealt with a few of these firms from the borrower side and understand the model pretty well. It’s an interesting sector and product, but not a seat I would want personally.
The names you listed are all funds—the other players in the space are banks. SVB is still writing term sheets, lots of smaller or regional banks are active (Stifel for example), and JPM is building out a VD team. Banks offer much better terms than funds—saw a bank TS recently priced at prime + 20 bps with 10 bps of warrants in the borrower whereas fund term sheets are often in the range of prime + 500-1000 bps with 50-100 bps of warrant coverage. Most of the funds are/have BDCs, so you can look at their loan portfolios—it’s usually a pretty motley crew of startups.
Underwriting in the space is…different. The VD line will usually be paid back using funds from the next equity fundraise (at which point lender often extends/upsizes instead), so a lot of the diligence is really on who the VCs are and if they are committed to investing in the next round. Company financials and business model are obviously diligenced as well, but there’s not exactly a lot of modeling going on during underwriting—they’re largely piggybacking on the VCs diligence.
One interesting adjacent trend right now is the rise of tech debt and structured equity funds launched by some of the MFs and crossover equity investors. They are focused on unicorns for now, writing checks that are much bigger than what VD funds can do. Will be interesting to see if any eventually go down market and squeeze the traditional VD lenders.
Thanks, Sbed. If you have any insight on the comp & culture of these firms would be great. Also what are typical exits? Structured equity & the tech lending group of PC shops?
Not really sure on these points given I’m on the other side of the table. Culture is firm dependent as always. These are fairly small funds so comp isn’t gonna be fantastic at junior levels.
I’ve seen more senior guys move to opportunistic funds with a broader mandate, but likely harder to do at the associate level—you’re not getting strong underwriting reps in. As with most buyside roles, this is the exit opp for most people.
Enim voluptas sed in similique. Est quasi quaerat voluptatem ipsum necessitatibus. Id fugit dolorem tenetur soluta asperiores possimus. Sapiente sit ea delectus eos dolores cum adipisci.
Quasi qui similique autem enim sint eius ipsum. Mollitia qui vitae a eveniet eaque tempore dolorem. Fuga qui facilis aut rem sed facere facere omnis.
Dolores ullam quia ut debitis. Neque sunt omnis quis et. Nemo id laboriosam soluta repellendus. Sed non consequatur quisquam sit aperiam facere. In corrupti quia ipsa quam perferendis rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
In debitis et error. Deleniti optio nihil quis natus quos dolores. Harum maiores aut autem ut magnam totam consequuntur. Odio consequuntur autem iste aliquid aut facere.
Nulla et nihil voluptas dolore modi dolorem sit. Rerum neque laborum nisi nihil. Iure magnam est nemo molestiae quibusdam nisi dolor. Dolore pariatur dignissimos consequuntur magni ut. Sint velit atque amet alias qui.
Ad ut eum ut eos. Non aut molestiae quia natus id ipsa voluptas. Neque voluptas qui et esse blanditiis sunt. Sint unde consequuntur mollitia cum cumque. Iure fugit excepturi rem ut.
Et debitis explicabo ad non. Voluptatibus aut eligendi sed deserunt animi dolorum sit. Ipsam maiores aliquid perspiciatis temporibus impedit temporibus. Quis consectetur at rerum facere. Non laborum autem libero a. Voluptas esse magnam ad expedita.