Why private equity practice vs. general practice?

I'm very interested in starting a career in consulting and am considering whether to apply for the private equity practice or general practice of MBB firms. What are the pros / cons of working in the private equity practice vs. working in the general practice of MBB firms?

15 Comments
 
Most Helpful

In the PE practice you'll presumably be focusing on due diligence projects, or DDs. In a DD, a private equity firm hires your consulting firm to basically create a research report about the company they're interesting in buying -- what market do they compete in, who are their competitors and how do they stack up, what trends are happening in their market that could impact them, etc. Through this research you'd try and get a sense of what a company is really worth and what opportunities or headwinds are facing them, which helps PE firms make a decision

PE DDs are usually very short projects (1-3 weeks is not uncommon, whereas other strategy consulting projects are most typically 2-6 months) and extremely high burn (long hours, fast paced)

IMO, the primary reason you'd want to do PE work is because you're interested in related exits such as PE investor role, VC, or corp dev. If you're not, personally I'd recommend steering clear since the WLB is bad and PE practices often attract some pretty bad people to work for (not saying all or a certain % are what I'd consider 'toxic' but certainly more than consulting more broadly)

 

Assuming the above responses are for the US, I'll provide a bit of a UK view (going off of the geo tag having UK in your post).

PE practice

  • hours: 55-60h is our office average, with of course certain cases going to 65+, but these are generally 20% of total for us, based on the last 12 months of DDs I've seen
  • work: we do mostly CDDs indeed, but you also have VDDs (same but for the sell-side, meaning typically longer and better access to company data, but also more politics), ODDs or Ops DDs (looking at operational impact of CDD synergy plan), and post-acquisition strategy work (these are usually longer and vary quite a bit)
  • pros:
    • repeatable toolkit (you tend to do the same 4-5 things every time: market modelling, competitive positioning, customer analysis/survey, VCP/synergy plan)
    • short cases (2-4 weeks usually, unless VDD or post-ac)
    • very well-defined scope during cases (PE clients know exacrtly what they want and expect you to get to the point quickly)
    • predictable hours (more below)
    • exposure to large number of industries in short time (caveat that many will be tech/healthcare related)
    • little to no travel (you move only if co-locating with your team, in case you're spread over several offices, even then it's usually not necessary)
  • cons:
    • long hours (you definitely know you'll have 2-3 finishes past 10pm, sometimes near or past midnight, but you won't get blindsided with sudden scope changes/client requests last minute)
    • low variety in types of work (since you do the same thing over and over again)
    • usually little to no exposure to clients for presentation / working on client skills (it can vary based on the client and the Partners though)

General practice

  • hours: ~55h (our office avg; I'm also in that neighbourhood but I have seen cases go way above 65h+ in some instances, for multiple consecutive weeks)
  • work: anything and everything under the strategy Sun (depending on your firm's or office's specialisation of course)
  • pros:
    • usually lower hours (although it depends entirely on your client & partners on the project)
    • variety in types of projects (you can do cost reduction / pure strategy / market entry / post-merger improvement / etc.)
    • client exposure (you can hone your client mgmt skills over time quite nicely)
  • cons:
    • hours can be unpredictable (if your client suddenly wants to see a whole new analysis by next steer co in 2 days, that's on you to make it happen)
    • travel (can be a big negative when it's weekly and makes you wake up at 4am every Monday)
    • less varied exposure to industries than PE practices (although you can still see a few different ones, but fewer due to the longer project durations)

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Boston Consulting Group 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Consulting

  • Cornerstone Research 99.5%
  • Bain & Company 99.0%
  • Boston Consulting Group 98.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.9%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.5%
  • Boston Consulting Group 99.0%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.4%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.9%
  • LEK Consulting 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $361
  • Principal (30) $294
  • Director/MD (58) $274
  • Vice President (54) $246
  • Engagement Manager (113) $232
  • Manager (170) $173
  • 2nd Year Associate (185) $142
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (116) $135
  • Senior Consultant (354) $132
  • Consultant (642) $122
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (164) $121
  • 1st Year Associate (576) $121
  • NA (16) $114
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (390) $104
  • Associate Consultant (176) $101
  • 1st Year Analyst (1163) $90
  • Intern/Summer Associate (208) $83
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (632) $68
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”