http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204…
I have a problem with this article. It sounds like Zuckerman is sensationalizing the fact that PE is not immune to a business cycle. He takes the facts that deals can't get done at pre-recession leverage levels and prices (yeah no shit asshole) and makes the resulting decline in profitability out to be a secular trend. That's the kind of shit my girlfriend tries to pull, if you follow my logic.
| +47 | Independent Sponsor - Path Ahead? | 15 | 2d |
| +34 | 2026 PE Associate Bonus Thread | 42 | 2h |
| +34 | Legacy vs. Up-and-Coming Funds | 16 | 2d |
| +34 | Does anyone believe their firm has a true competitive edge | 14 | 1m |
| +23 | Mid Level Attrition | 12 | 31m |
| +22 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 3 | 39m |
| +21 | Semi-target into IB (London) -> PE | 20 | 5d |
| +19 | Do you regret doing PE? | 6 | 2d |
| +14 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 3 | 2h |
| +11 | those of you who had an easy banking experience - how f’d were you when you went to PE? | 7 | 5d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Times change, there will always be ebb and flow. I'm reading a great book right now called "King of Capital" about Steve Schwartzman and Blackstone. Its a great read and gives a great history of the buyout business. Looking at the margins from back in the day to now, at least in equity infusion, is a lot different. Doesn't mean its bad, just mean things change.
So whats your issue with the article? its merely an observation of fact
There are facts in the article: Funds have money that needs to be put to work and the debt markets aren't there right now so they're paying higher multiples on less leverage. As a result sponsors are branching into different assets. But don't you see that as kind of a cyclical phenomenon? Don't you think when things come around PE will turn back to the buyout? I just want to hear others' views.
equity contributions may have spiked in the past couple years due (at least in part) to the recess in clos taking down large chunks of debt in these deals, but the same vehicles inflated leverage pre 08 and i don't see equity contributions dipping lower than mid-to-high 30s any time soon. as debt got more expensive towards the end of the year last year, it meant the deals that got done were higher quality. when funds have record levels of dry powder and need to put it to work. they may seek other assets and that is to be expected. i agree with the cyclicality argument, and would expect a wave of repricings followed by a wave of recap/dividends followed by increased lbo volume followed by lower equity contributions once the market heats back up (similar to early 2011). when the market heats back up? that's another question. funds are adapting, not becoming extinct. they have and will continue to serve a very important role.
Expedita officiis eveniet possimus cumque. Iure aut cumque aut non corrupti cum est. Est non enim et laboriosam rerum. Velit quo temporibus voluptate minima autem. Cum id officiis ex qui quisquam error.
Unde illum eum eum quod. Sint laudantium voluptatibus quo est labore voluptatem beatae. Soluta vel ea facilis voluptatem et est. Eum ullam harum et dolor aperiam. Molestias modi aliquam mollitia quia exercitationem.
Ipsam vero corporis id velit aspernatur recusandae. Dolore quod qui eum velit culpa repudiandae. Aut eius velit provident assumenda.
Aut et placeat necessitatibus qui. Blanditiis sint aspernatur delectus dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...