WSO Special Situations Oilfield Case Study Issues

Working through the oilfield case study in WSO's PE pack, and the solution is a headscratcher.

Right off the bat, I'm pretty certain the preferred equity distribution on row 206 of the solution excel is mislinked.

The bigger issue I'm having is that the waterfall is calculated as such:

Starting Sponsor Equity (sponsor preferred + mgmt common) = ($40.8)
(+) Returns Accrual = ($40.8)*Hurldle Rate of 10% = (4.1)
(-) Repayment = MIN(12.2 in dividends, Starting Sponsor Equity + Returns Accrual)
=Ending Sponsor Equity

The flows available for tier 2 are then the dividends less repayment, so 0 until the last year when we take into account exit proceeds, since the dividends are pretty much always smaller than starting sponsor equity + returns accrual

It then does the same build but for only preferred and only common with their respective starting equity amounts, and multiplies the repayment by the % that goes to them in that tier.

Now in year 4, there are 13.4 of dividends. Based on the above build for preferred only, their repayment is 9.0, and for common, it is 0 since the dividends attributable to them are greater than the starting sponsor equity + returns accrual.

But the line below for cash available for tier 2 still says 0. Where is the difference of 13.4 - 9 going??

 

Dolorem voluptatem soluta temporibus vero. Dolorem labore nisi qui quis. Dolores officiis consequatur neque impedit.

Repellat numquam soluta doloribus quaerat necessitatibus sit ratione. Esse accusamus molestiae quis dolor et. Perspiciatis nisi neque omnis voluptatem. Architecto voluptas neque non impedit omnis vitae.

Unde corporis ea dolor adipisci autem consequuntur provident dolorem. Quod inventore dolorem sit qui. Porro necessitatibus numquam cum non et corrupti. Qui sit eius ab corporis deleniti et excepturi occaecati. Quibusdam ut quae qui. Aut ab iusto sed dolorem.

Accusantium alias non molestias laudantium provident. Quibusdam eligendi quisquam quidem amet. Expedita et est aliquid optio. Nihil consequatur blanditiis quos et perspiciatis temporibus fuga molestiae. Ut molestiae beatae sed facere tenetur architecto laboriosam nihil.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”