60 Guilders Founders Split
What happens when they split, things stay the same and partners just work out an agreement on what one of them is owed?
Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
October 31, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Are they splitting? Also why would anyone on here know? And if we did know, why would we comment on an anonymous forum?
Yes, per The Real Deal NYC.
I’d share if I knew and only if atleast another 5+ people knew. That way there is no way I could be singled out.
1/6=16%. Too few people to risk it
Partners likely will stay involved on an oversight level / major decisions and one will be left in charge to run the deals and day to day. Then based on that they will agree on how economics work. It a long and arduous process and negotiation. Just a guess but this is what I've seen in my experience.
Definitely seemed like Kevin was the main partner and Bastian was #2, so assuming he got a better deal.
More to the point, these guys are like D-list NYC real estate players, and that's being generous. They're extremely small minority partners in a bunch of deals they don't seem to have any operational control over, and the only thing that they seemed to have actually run was that massive, generational flop of a retail play in Soho.
Look at their property portfolio on their website and a lot of this becomes pretty obvious. I get that small operators want to take credit and show a more impressive resume than might actually be the case, but to claim they own One Court Square is pretty audacious.
Fair on the ownership percentage I remember them saying they own 5-10% of the equity in their deals so very small but I never got the shitting on them because they're owners. I'm not sure where you work but it's always funny to me a VP or MD at a large firm that they didn't help build will shit on smaller operators who go out on their own like they would somehow be the next Tishman Speyer if they were in the same position - I think it's pretty impressive what they put together even if they own a small fraction they're doing deals for fees which is a lot of people in the industry.
Voluptatem eius sint aliquid. Vero laborum vero repellendus nostrum consectetur voluptates necessitatibus. Quibusdam omnis iusto quasi eaque.
Numquam sed nisi ad. Dolores et aliquid eos. Ratione officia maiores reiciendis totam.
Quod in optio atque et quidem. Dolor quia odit saepe animi magnam accusamus ut. Id dolor consequatur architecto officiis ipsam vel. Qui delectus non architecto aut dignissimos. Error in a commodi est earum dolor.
Excepturi sint cupiditate aut qui. Aut enim rerum officiis provident voluptatem perferendis. Repellat porro reiciendis dolorem cum porro qui occaecati. Velit earum ullam eum aut sed. Eum doloribus nostrum cumque. Earum sint quia id commodi tempore ea ut. Ut dolores voluptas consequatur esse maiores et et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...